Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)
Documents citing Smt.Satya Prakashi Parsedia vs The State Of M.P. on 21 June, 2016

Smt. Pinky Shivraj Shah vs State Of Chhattisgarh 65 Wpc/4/2019 ... on 20 March, 2019

In Smt. Satya Prakashi Parsadia (supra) the Court has interpreted what is provided in the Rules, however, in absence of any such provision concerning satisfaction of the prescribed authority having been mentioned under Rule 3 (1), it is not permissible to hold that the Collector was required to personally verify the signature of each of the member signing the motion of no confidence.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1