Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.58 seconds)

Ambikavathi vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Prison on 30 October, 2023

Incidentally, another co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the case of Shakila Vs. The State represented by its Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 and others, passed in W.P.No.2761 of 2023 dated 10.02.2023, had rendered a liberal interpretation to Rule 40 and held that the Rules as such are not absolute. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:-
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

Ambikavathi vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Prison on 30 October, 2023

Incidentally, another co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the case of Shakila Vs. The State represented by its Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 and others, passed in W.P.No.2761 of 2023 dated 10.02.2023, had rendered a liberal interpretation to Rule 40 and held that the Rules as such are not absolute. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:-
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

Ambikavathi vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Prison on 30 October, 2023

Incidentally, another co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the case of Shakila Vs. The State represented by its Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 and others, passed in W.P.No.2761 of 2023 dated 10.02.2023, had rendered a liberal interpretation to Rule 40 and held that the Rules as such are not absolute. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:-
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

Ambikavathi vs The Deputy Inspector General Of Prison on 30 October, 2023

Incidentally, another co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the case of Shakila Vs. The State represented by its Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009 and others, passed in W.P.No.2761 of 2023 dated 10.02.2023, had rendered a liberal interpretation to Rule 40 and held that the Rules as such are not absolute. The relevant portion of the order reads as follows:-
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document
1