Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (2.00 seconds)

Ramesh Babu C L vs Srinivasa Mruthy K L on 20 April, 2024

If at all they are genuine in their conduct, the moment after supplying the documents if the plaintiffs have not shown their inclinations to get the sale deed, then the contention of the defendants would have been accepted. Thus this Court has no doubt that the plaintiff was always ready and willing to perform his part of contract. In fact, they have made out the grounds to get the specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 18/12/2020. Thus, the decision in Mehboob-Ur-Rehman case is not 36 O.S.No.2747/2020 applicable to the case in hand. As the plaintiff's have proved that from the day one of the agreement, they were having sufficient money with their sources to perform their part of contract, but its the defendants who defaulted their part for contract. Thus, It is the defendants are duty bound to execute the registered sale deed by receiving balance sale consideration.
Bangalore District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Col. A. K Arora vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr. on 31 October, 2022

5. The learned senior counsel for the DDA placed reliance on judgment of the Supreme Court in Mehboob-ur-Rehman v. Ahsanul Ghani, (2019) 19 SCC 415, wherein the Supreme Court observed that the continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract is the threshold requirement to seek the relief of specific performance. The relevant paragraph relied upon by the DDA is reproduced hereunder:
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Datta - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next