Union Of India Through General Manager vs Krishna Manjhi & Anothers on 7 March, 2019
It also noticed that it was clear from the order dated 29.03.2016
recorded by the Special Judge CBI Patiala in Krishan Manjhi Vs. CBI that
closure reports in the matter had been filed twice on behalf of CBI. The
3 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 16-03-2019 22:59:03 :::
C.W.P. No.13091-CAT-2018 [4]
Tribunal concluded that the matter had been prolonged far too long and it is
uncertain when it would reach conclusion. Respondent No. 1 who had
served the railways from May 1976 to July 2013 could not be kept waiting
for his retiral benefits. There was no justification in withholding his retiral
benefits.