Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.32 seconds)

Central Warehousing Corporation vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 15 February, 2018

However, in the case of Parshotam Dass (supra) SLP was granted and it was converted to Civil Appeal No. 8129 of 2014. The said appeal was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 26.8.2015 stating "we have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis. Having gone through the records of the case and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the appeal, being devoid of any merit, deserves to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly. Ordered accordingly."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document

Parshotam Sharma And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Another on 12 March, 2025

23),, passed by the Court of learned S Sub ub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Garhshankar in case titled as State of Punjab vs. Parshotam Sharma and another, arising out of FIR No. 113 dated 19.06.2020, registered under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC at Police Station Garhshankar, Hoshiarpur, Hoshiarpur whereby the petitioner had been declared a proclaimed offender,, is quashed with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parshotam Sharma And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Another on 18 March, 2025

23),, passed by the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Garhshankar in case titled as State of Punjab vs. Parshotam Sharma and another, arising out of FIR No. 112 dated 19.06.2020, registered under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC at Police Station Garhshankar, Hoshiarpur, Hoshiarpur whereby the petitioners petitioner had been declared aas proclaimed offenders,, is quashed with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dhani Chand & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 29 September, 2010

[9]. To be fair to learned counsel for the petitioners, he has referred to a recent decision dated 02.08.2010 in LPA No. 890 of 2010 [State of Punjab & Ors. v Parshotam Dass & Anr.] to contend that when the allotment is made by a government agency through an open auction without there being any possibility of evasion of stamp duty, the stamp duty and registration charges are to be affixed as per the sale price mentioned in the allotment letter. In my considered view, firstly no such inference can be drawn from the CWP No. 1743 of 2009. ::-5-::
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - S Kant - Full Document

Mukand Lal vs State Of Punjab And Others on 6 February, 2012

5. After giving thoughtful consideration to the respective submissions, I find that a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.890 of 2010, State of Punjab and others v. Parshotam Dass and another, decided on 2.8.2010, while considering an issue relating to payment of stamp duty on a transaction where the property had been sold by auction by public body and the installments were paid in due course, held that the stamp duty was payable on the price of the auction. The relevant observations recorded therein read thus:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Jaswant Kaur & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 13 October, 2010

2. Case of the appellants is that there was no justification for demand of higher stamp duty. Valuation has to be as per the consideration in the document executed by a Government agency as provided in notification dated 2.3.2009, Annexure P-7. Reliance has also been placed on DB judgment of this Court dated 2.8.2010 in L.P.A. No.890 of 2010 State of L.P.A. No.1328 of 2010 2 Punjab & others v. Parshotam Dass & another, affirming the view taken by learned Single Judge on the issue involved.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Goel - Full Document
1