Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.67 seconds)
Documents citing Santosh Kumar Yadav Son Of Ramashanker vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Home ... on 8 August, 2005

Ramashankar Yadav vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

15.2 It is notice that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rama Nand & others (supra) the 3-Judge Bench while considering the issue whether the benefits accruing to the appellants therein as a consequence of the reorganization scheme of wireless and communication system could be said to given them the benefit of a promotion and whether they were still entitled to a financial upgradation on account of ACP 2026.04.07 JITENDRA 14:43:34 RAJ MEHTA +05'30' 48 OA No.105/2023 and 3 connected OAs Scheme, had considered and relied upon the judgment passed in cases of Pushpa Rani (supra) and BSNL Vs. R. Santhakumari (supra) and by recording the finding that the consequence of reorganization of the cadre resulted in not only a mere re-description of the post but also much higher pay scale being granted to the appellants based on an element of selection criteria. Since there is a requirement of minimum five years service, thus, all Telephone Operators would not automatically eligible for the new posts. Further, the financial emoluments are much higher and the said Telephone Operators can be said to be eligible for such new post and higher pay scale on completion of training. All these cannot be stated to be only an exercise of merely re-description or re-organization of the cadre.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashish Y Chaturvedi vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

15.2 It is notice that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rama Nand & others (supra) the 3-Judge Bench while considering the issue whether the benefits accruing to the appellants therein as a consequence of the reorganization scheme of wireless and communication system could be said to given them the benefit of a promotion and whether they were still entitled to a financial upgradation on account of ACP JITENDRA RAJ 2026.04.13 MEHTA 12:55:08+05'30' 48 OA No.105/2023 and 3 connected OAs Scheme, had considered and relied upon the judgment passed in cases of Pushpa Rani (supra) and BSNL Vs. R. Santhakumari (supra) and by recording the finding that the consequence of reorganization of the cadre resulted in not only a mere re-description of the post but also much higher pay scale being granted to the appellants based on an element of selection criteria. Since there is a requirement of minimum five years service, thus, all Telephone Operators would not automatically eligible for the new posts. Further, the financial emoluments are much higher and the said Telephone Operators can be said to be eligible for such new post and higher pay scale on completion of training. All these cannot be stated to be only an exercise of merely re-description or re-organization of the cadre.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devendra K Garg vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

15.2 It is notice that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rama Nand & others (supra) the 3-Judge Bench while considering the issue whether the benefits accruing to the appellants therein as a consequence of the reorganization scheme of wireless and communication system could be said to given them the benefit of a promotion and whether they were still entitled to a financial upgradation on account of ACP JITENDRA RAJ 2026.04.13 MEHTA 12:59:38+05'30' 48 OA No.105/2023 and 3 connected OAs Scheme, had considered and relied upon the judgment passed in cases of Pushpa Rani (supra) and BSNL Vs. R. Santhakumari (supra) and by recording the finding that the consequence of reorganization of the cadre resulted in not only a mere re-description of the post but also much higher pay scale being granted to the appellants based on an element of selection criteria. Since there is a requirement of minimum five years service, thus, all Telephone Operators would not automatically eligible for the new posts. Further, the financial emoluments are much higher and the said Telephone Operators can be said to be eligible for such new post and higher pay scale on completion of training. All these cannot be stated to be only an exercise of merely re-description or re-organization of the cadre.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dullamanji D. vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

15.2 It is notice that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rama Nand & others (supra) the 3-Judge Bench while considering the issue whether the benefits accruing to the appellants therein as a consequence of the reorganization scheme of wireless and communication system could be said to given them the benefit of a promotion and whether they were still entitled to a financial upgradation on account of ACP 2026.04.13 JITENDRA 13:08:42+ 48 OA No.105/2023 and 3 connected OAs Scheme, had considered and relied upon the judgment passed in cases of Pushpa Rani (supra) and BSNL Vs. R. Santhakumari (supra) and by recording the finding that the consequence of reorganization of the cadre resulted in not only a mere re-description of the post but also much higher pay scale being granted to the appellants based on an element of selection criteria. Since there is a requirement of minimum five years service, thus, all Telephone Operators would not automatically eligible for the new posts. Further, the financial emoluments are much higher and the said Telephone Operators can be said to be eligible for such new post and higher pay scale on completion of training. All these cannot be stated to be only an exercise of merely re-description or re-organization of the cadre.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vijay Bhatt vs Western Railway on 6 April, 2026

15.2 It is notice that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rama Nand & others (supra) the 3-Judge Bench while considering the issue whether the benefits accruing to the appellants therein as a consequence of the reorganization scheme of wireless and communication system could be said to given them the benefit of a promotion and whether they were still entitled to a financial upgradation on account of ACP JITENDRA RAJ 2026.04.13 MEHTA 13:04:28+05'30' 48 OA No.105/2023 and 3 connected OAs Scheme, had considered and relied upon the judgment passed in cases of Pushpa Rani (supra) and BSNL Vs. R. Santhakumari (supra) and by recording the finding that the consequence of reorganization of the cadre resulted in not only a mere re-description of the post but also much higher pay scale being granted to the appellants based on an element of selection criteria. Since there is a requirement of minimum five years service, thus, all Telephone Operators would not automatically eligible for the new posts. Further, the financial emoluments are much higher and the said Telephone Operators can be said to be eligible for such new post and higher pay scale on completion of training. All these cannot be stated to be only an exercise of merely re-description or re-organization of the cadre.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Yadav vs Union Of India Judgement Given By: ... on 12 December, 2013

Respondents have filed the reply and apart from contending that the claim was barred by time, respondents have indicated as to how and in what basis the merit criteria was considered and it is pointed out in Para-3.5 of the return that the claim of the petitioner was considered on three occasions in the year 2006, 2007 and 2008 and on all these W.P.No.18266/2011 Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs. The Union of India & Ors.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Basant Kumar Batham And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28 October, 2025

In view of the analysis and for the reasons mentioned in the order dated 15.10.2025 passed by Division Bench in WRIT - C No. - 26529 of 2025 (Ramashankar Yadav And Another vs. Union Of India And 3 Others), we are not inclined to entertain the instant writ petition. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the petitioners to avail the statutory remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if they are so advised, within the limitation period prescribed thereunder.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document
1