Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.28 seconds)

Krishna R. Bhat, Mumbai vs Assessee on 2 November, 2012

Krishna R. Bhat vs. Asst. CIT 3.8 Firstly, therefore, there is to begin with, no evidence of the work actually performed, which is limited only to introduction, and which (evidence) we have explained would stand to be generated in the normal course of business. They are all persons who are either involved in unrelated trades and/or have even remotely no connection with the assessee's trade or business or products. They are, therefore, most unlikely to be contacted by the assessee for the purpose. They have only collected the information which is not only readily available in the public domain, but also in the trade circles, as each supplier endeavours to increase his visibility by advertising in the trade journals, projection and participation in other forums, as well as through the net. They are not aware of the products being dealt with by them, not to speak of the parties themselves, or even of the assessee's requirements. In fact, most of them are also not aware of even the rate at which the commission stands paid to them. Our examination of the facts of the case (refer paras 3.1 to 3.7 of this order), including the modus operandi adopted, which we have also found to be inconsistent with the business model being followed, has led us to find that no brokering work could under the circumstances, which is also not the claim, could be made, much less genuine referral work, which requires a much more comprehensive data base, analysis and knowledge. The paper-book placed on record, which has also been carefully perused, only bears the accounting information, and qua which there is no dispute, though that by itself would be of no moment. The assessee's case, to which no improvement could be made by it before us, is thus without substance. The case law relied upon would be of little moment in view of the matter being factual and having been decided on facts. Under the circumstances, therefore, we have no hesitation in confirming the concurrent findings of the authorities below. We decide accordingly.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1