Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13696 (1.56 seconds)
Documents citing Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. vs Jaibir Singh & Ors. on 21 December, 2009

Radha @ Radha Rani vs . Sanjay @ Harish & Ors. on 13 December, 2019

Accordingly, the Manager, State Bank of India, District Courts Complex, Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi is directed to transfer the above­said cash amount to the above­said SB Account No. 1159644834 of petitioner­ Prem W/o Sh.Mehtab Singh at Central Bank of India , Mitraon, New Delhi and to keep the remaining amount in the form of above mentioned FDRs in terms of Motor Accident Claims Annuity Deposit Scheme (MACAD Scheme) formulated vide Orders dated 01.5.2018 and 07.12.2018 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in FAO No. 842/2013 ( Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. Vs. Jaibir Singh & Ors.).
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jaipal Singh vs . Mohd. Sayeed & Ors. on 29 November, 2019

Accordingly, the Manager, State Bank of India, District Courts Complex, Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi is directed to transfer the above­said cash amount to the above­said SB Account No. 2742101016814 of petitioner­ Kapil Kajla at Canara Bank,Thana Road, Najafgarh, New Delhi and to keep the remaining amount in the form of above mentioned FDRs in terms of Motor Accident Claims Annuity Deposit Scheme (MACAD Scheme) formulated vide Orders dated 01.5.2018 and 07.12.2018 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in FAO No. 842/2013 ( Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. Vs. Jaibir Singh & Ors.).
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahender & Ors. vs . Aditya Kumar Singh & Ors. on 29 January, 2019

Accordingly, the Manager, State Bank of India, District Courts Complex, Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi is directed to transfer the above­said cash amount to the above­said SB Account No. 164410100033573 of petitioner /injured­ Pradeep MACP Nos.369/16, 370/16, 986/16, 987/16 989/16 Anopi & Ors. Vs. Aditya Kr.& Ors. 64/66 65 Kumar Solanki at Andhra Bank, Sec.9, R.K.Puram, New Delhi and to keep the remaining amount in the form of above mentioned FDRs in terms of Motor Accident Claims Annuity Deposit Scheme (MACAD Scheme) formulated vide Orders dated 01.5.2018 and 07.12.2018 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in FAO No. 842/2013 ( Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. Vs. Jaibir Singh & Ors.).
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagdish & Ors. vs . Suresh Chander Vats & Anr. on 16 January, 2019

Accordingly, the Manager, State Bank of India, District Courts Complex, Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi is directed to transfer the above­said cash amount to the above­said SB Account No. 520101253329784 of petitioner/injured­ Brij Kishore at Corporation Bank, Adilbadh, Dabri Main Road, Palam, New Delhi and to keep the remaining amount in the form of above mentioned FDRs in terms of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Annuity Deposit (MACAD) Scheme formulated vide orders dated 01.5.2018 and 07.12.2018 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in FAO No. 842/2013 ( Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. Vs. Jaibir Singh & Ors.).
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sangita Devi & Ors. vs . Praveen Kumar & Ors. on 27 May, 2019

Accordingly, the Manager, State Bank of India, District Courts Complex, Sector­10, Dwarka, New Delhi is directed to transfer the above­said cash amount to the above­said SB Account No. 593602010009123 of petitioner/injured Pawan Kumar at Union Bank of India ,Dhanauti, District Jahanabad, Bihar and to keep the remaining amount in the form of above mentioned FDRs in terms of Motor Accident Claims Annuity Deposit Scheme (MACAD Scheme) formulated vide Orders dated 01.5.2018 and 07.12.2018 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in FAO No. 842/2013 ( Rajesh Tyagi & Ors. Vs. Jaibir Singh & Ors.).
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Poonam vs Ashok Kumar Page 1 Of 23 on 2 September, 2019

In view of the directions contained in order dated 18.01.2018 of Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha in FAO no. 842/2003 titled as Rajesh Tyagi vs Jaibir Singh, the statement of petitioner was also recorded Poonam vs Ashok Kumar Page 20 of 23 Poonam vs Ashok Kumar Page 21 of 23 wherein she had stated that petitioner was entitled to exemption from deduction of TDS and that she would submit form 15G to the insurance co. so that no TDS is deducted.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

517­14 Mohd. Kareem vs Pawan Kumar Page 1 Of 21 on 8 October, 2018

In view  of the directions contained in order  dated 18.01.2018 of Hon'ble   Mr.   Justice   J.R.   Midha   in   FAO   no.   842/2003   titled   as   Rajesh Tyagi   vs   Jaibir   Singh,   the   statement   of   petitioner   was   also   recorded wherein   he   had   stated   that   petitioner   was   entitled   to   exemption   from deduction of TDS and that he would submit form 15G to the insurance co. so that no TDS is deducted.
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

487­14 Smt. Badal vs Rampal Page 1 Of 23 on 8 October, 2018

In view  of the directions contained in order  dated 18.01.2018 of Hon'ble   Mr.   Justice   J.R.   Midha   in   FAO   no.   842/2003   titled   as   Rajesh Tyagi   vs   Jaibir   Singh,   the   statement   of   petitioner   was   also   recorded wherein she had stated that petitioner was entitled to exemption from deduction of TDS and that he would submit form 15G to the insurance co. so that no TDS is deducted.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next