Kishorilal Mathur vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 August, 1997
10. After going through the record, we reach the unescapable concussion that the adverse entries are neither vague nor it can be said that the same are based on no evidence/material and, therefore, the judgments in O.P. Jain v. the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan 1990 (2) RLR 257 and Ratanlal Agarwal v. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, 1995 (3) WLC 428, which have been relied upon by Sri Singhvi and wherein it has been held that adverse remarks should not be vague and should be based on some material, are not applicable in the instant case.