Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 40 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing K.S. Kamakshi Chetty, P. Ponnappan, P. ... vs The Commissioner, Aruppukottai ... on 5 February, 2008

Gemini Fabricators vs The Secretary on 11 January, 2022

In view of the settled legal position where number of orders have been passed and in respect of the very same notification as referred to above in S.Anand's case, a detailed order has been passed where the points raised by the petitioner had already been raised which have been accepted by this Court, as has been quoted herein above, this Court is of the considered view that, the petitioner is entitled to succeed in this writ petition in view of the covered issue.
Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - R S Kumar - Full Document

Singai N.Muthu vs The Secretary To Government on 31 July, 2018

9. I had an occasion to consider a similar issue in M.Amsavalli Vs. The Director of Town and Country Planning (supra) and by following the principles laid down in K.S.Kamakshi Chetty and others vs. Commissioner, Aruppukottai Municipality, Aruppukottai and another [2008 (2) MLJ 184] and P.Babu V. The Director, Town & Country Planning, Chennai [CDJ 2017 MHC 2551], held that since no steps have been taken by the respondents either to acquire the land or make publication within a period of three years from the date of notification, lands are deemed to have been released from the acquisition as per the deeming provision of Section 38 of the Act.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - K Kalyanasundaram - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next