Ku. Anita, Minor vs Atal Bihari And Anr. on 8 May, 1992
See Birad Mal Singhvi v. Anand Purohit, AIR 1988 SC 1796; D. K. Arya v. Union of India, 1990 (1) MPWN 204 (DB) and Pramy V. Ram Nayak v. Smt. Tirath Bai, 1985 MPWN 185. True, the report of the radiological examination of the accused gives the age between 16 and 18 years. However, it is notorious and one can take judicial notice that the margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination is two years on either side.