Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.40 seconds)

Prakash Chand vs India Tourism Development Corporation on 4 December, 2023

6. It is contended in the OA that the respondent without even processing/referring to the submissions of the applicant advanced in his reply dated 06.08.2021 in terms of ratio laid down in W.P.(C).3676/2013 titled as Dr. Sahdev Singh Vs Union of India, mechanically issued the order of appointment of enquiry officer and presenting officer vide Ref.No. PB-73(165)/4572 dated 16.08.2019, leaving the applicant in the disadvantage of not knowing in what respect his reply was deficient.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Mala Ramakrishnan vs Union Of India Through Secretary on 12 January, 2010

The learned counsel for the respondents invited our attention and submitted that this very question arose for consideration before the Principal Bench in a identical matter in a OA filed by the same MES Officers whose case was determined along with the applicant in the DPC held in 1986 and the seniority list published in 1987 (A.K. BAJAJ Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS., decided on 29.01.1993 in Tr. A. No. 1037/1985) raising the same question about the same 1988 proceedings pertaining to MES.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1