Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (1.49 seconds)
Documents citing Prithvi Raj Bhandari vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India ... on 26 May, 2006

Saroj Devi vs Aviva Life Insurance Co. on 2 February, 2018

In case law referred above Prithvi Raj Bhandari versus Life Insurance Corporation of India Limited and others, (Supra), findings have been given by the Hon'ble Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission that mere registration of a criminal case cannot be a good ground to repudiate the insurance claim. The insured's business was well proved from various letters written by computer companies concerning his business. Nominee and legal heirs of insured, is a beneficiary and is entitled to receive the insurance claim.  Mere registration of a criminal case is not sufficient to repudiate the insurance claim. Cited case laws fully support the version of the complainant.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.K.Sarojamma vs Lic Of India on 10 January, 2008

: Another decision reported in 2006 C.T.J. 983 (CP) (NCDRC) Case is that Prithvi Raj Bhandrai Vs. LIC of India Ltd., and others, wherein it is also held that If the dominant intention of the act of felony is to kill any particular person then such killing is not an accidental murder but is a murder simplicitor. The said learned counsel also cited before us a decision of our A.P.State Commission reported in 2001(5) A.L.D. (Cons.)
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Shilpi Barman(Roy) on 6 August, 2018

Ld. Advocate for the Appellant argued that in the FRT, there was clear mention of the fact that a prolong time commotion had been prevailing between the deceased and the FIR named accused persons.... The accused occupied a land used by the villagers.... Finally the road was vacated by the panchayat....the accused persons were influential and economically strong.  They can't accept their defeat from Pradip Roy who lead the people for a village road that a mere person raise words against them and assembled all the people....FIR named persons decided to kill Pradip Roy.... arranged five notorious criminals and killed him in open day light on 26.05.2014. Accordingly, the Ld. Advocate claimed that it shows that the murder was not at all accidental.  Thus, relying on the decision of Hon'ble national Commission in Prithvi Raj Bhandari v. LIC Of India, as also the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Devi v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. 2000 ACJ 801 : (2000) 5 SCC 113, the Ld. Advocate concluded that there was no infirmity with the decision of the Appellant to reject the Respondent's claim for accidental death claim benefit.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. ... vs Pawan Balram Mulchandani on 25 September, 2018

This Commission also took into account the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case Rita Devi vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (supra) and another order passed by this Commission in Prithvi Raj Bhandari vs. LIC of India & Ors. III(2006) CPJ 213.  After analyzing the facts and circumstances in both these cases, this Commission reached the conclusion that in case the immediate cause of injury was not the result of any deliberate or willful act of the insured and that the occurrence of the accident was not expected on the part of the insured, the murder was to be counted as an 'accident'.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 11 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next