Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (7.52 seconds)

Union Of India And Ors vs Yad Ram on 9 August, 2023

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that as per Rule 3-A of the Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 1939 (for short-the 1939 Rules) an employee of the BSF is entitled to the grant of disability pension only if he/she is discharged from service on account of a disease which is attributable to the conditions of his service; the respondent was retired from service on account of a disease which was attributable to natural causes; thus, he was rightly denied the grant of disability pension; the respondent's petition was also liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches; through his petition the respondent did not challenge the order dated 06.02.2007 through which he had been denied the grant of disability pension and that the learned Single Judge allowed the respondent's case on the basis of the ratio of Sunita Devi vs. Union of India and another (CWP-17364-2016) which case was entirely different than that of the respondent as in Sunita Devi's case the issue was with regard to the grant of ex- gratia/family pension whereas in the instant case the claim made by the respondent was for the grant of disability pension.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document
1