Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.57 seconds)
Documents citing Golam Momen vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax ... on 24 April, 2003

Franciscan Sisters Of St.Joseph vs Mr.Manikandan on 13 December, 2017

13. For the reasons given and observations made, the question framed gets settled and we hold that there is no bar to entertain contempt proceedings or issue Rule during limitation period provided for appeal or even if the appeal against the order is filed and stay is not obtained. 30.5.In the judgment reported in 263 ITR 69 Cal [Golam Momen Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax], the Calcutta High Court held as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Duraiswamy - Full Document

Srijan Nirman Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 3 March, 2015

She cited Golam Momen v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax And Others reported in 263 ITR 69, a judgment of our Court to the effect that pendency of an appeal does not bar recovery proceedings under section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. She submitted that this decision refers to a host of decisions pronounced by different High Courts of our country and the Supreme Court, entertaining a similar view.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - I P Mukerji - Full Document
1