Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.11 seconds)

M/S Intercontinental Cargo Services vs Commissioner Of Customs, New Delhi on 10 April, 2012

The referral Bench has also taken note of the Tribunals decision in the case of G.P.Jaiswal vs. CC, Lucknow reported in 2008(226)ELT707(Tri.-Del.) wherein Tribunal after observing that there is no provision for filing appeal against rejection of renewal in terms of the provisions of Regulation 11, the Bench rejected the application for implementation of Tribunal orders in terms of Rule 41 of CEGAT Procedure Rules. As such the referral Bench observed that as there are two streams of decisions taking contraviews, the issue should be resolved by the Larger Bench.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

4. Whether Order Is To Be Circulated To ... vs M/S Ramaans Total Logistics Pvt.Ltd on 19 June, 2014

He would also submit that the same view has been expressed by the co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of G.P. Jaiswal Vs CC Lucknow  2008 (226) ELT 707 (Tri-Del), wherein it was held that appeal of the Tribunal is provided under the law only against the order of suspension or provision of license. It is his submission that this order being administrative, the matter may be disposed of and the appeal be dismissed.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Godfrey Prathap, Managing Partner vs Commissioner Of Central Excise ... on 6 March, 2015

2. Heard the learned AR. He submits that the issue involved is whether the appellant should be given a CHA licence or not and in the case of G.P. Jaiswal Vs. CC, Lucknow [2008(226) ELT 707 (Tri.- Del.)], it has been held that in the case of rejection of application for CHA licence, there is no appeal to the Tribunal but the appellant has to make request to the Chief Commissioner. He submits that the decision may be followed.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1