Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 107 (0.85 seconds)
Documents citing K.C. P. Employees' Association, Madras vs Management Of K. C. P. Ltd., Madras on 24 January, 1978

Relied Upon The Authorities Reported As ... vs Jagpal on 23 April, 2007

13. This Court in the case of Employees' Association v. Management of K.C.P. Ltd., Madras observed: (SCC p. 44, para 5) In Industrial Law, interpreted and, applied in the perspective of Part IV of the Constitution, the benefit of reasonable doubt on law and facts, if there be such doubt, must go to the weaker section, labour. The Tribunal will dispose of the case making this compassionate approach but without overstepping the proved facts, . . .
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ltd vs Workmen And Others Ai R 1967 S. C. 469 ... on 15 May, 2007

13. This Court in the case of Employees' Association v. Management of K.C.P. Ltd., Madras observed: (SCC p. 44, para 5) In Industrial Law, interpreted and, applied in the perspective of Part IV of the Constitution, the benefit of reasonable doubt on law and facts, if there be such doubt, must go to the weaker section, labour. The Tribunal will dispose of the case making this compassionate approach but without overstepping the proved facts, . . .
Delhi District Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Centre For Development Of Telematcs vs D. Suresh And Ors. on 5 August, 2003

12. As regards the decision in K.C.P. EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION, MADRAS vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF K.C.P. LTD., & OTHERS(Supra), it deals with the bonus dispute between the management-respondent and the workmen union revolving round the applicability of the proviso to S. 3 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The Apex Court held that the benefit of reasonable doubt on law and facts must go to the weaker section, labour, and directed the Tribunal to dispose of the case making compassionate approach without over-stepping the proved facts, correct the balance-sheets and profit and loss accounts of the Central Workshop justifying by the Act and evidence and to finish the lis and dismissed the appeals.
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs The Presiding Officer And Ors. on 7 July, 1989

He entertained doubt as to whether an ordinary member of the employers' association could be treated as an officer and regard being had to the decision of the Supreme Court in K.C.P. Employers' Association v. Management of K.C. Pvt. Ltd. (supra), that in Industrial Law interpreted and applied in the perspective of Part IV of the Constitution the benefit of reasonable doubt of law and facts, if there be such doubt, must go to the weaker section, labour. He has, in my opinion, given the benefit of doubt of such interpretation of the expression 'officer' in favour of the Labour. In my view the learned Tribunal did not commit any illegality in refusing to permit the petitioner to be represented by two Executive Committee members of the Association.
Calcutta High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Sh. Sandeep Yadav vs M/S A.D.S Advertising Private Ltd on 1 September, 2007

13. This Court in the case of Employees' Association v. Management of K.C.P. Ltd., Madras observed: (SCC p. 44, para 5) In Industrial Law, interpreted and, applied in the ID No. 359/2005 13 perspective of Part IV of the Constitution, the benefit of reasonable doubt on law and facts, if there be such doubt, must go to the weaker section, labour. The Tribunal will dispose of the case making this compassionate approach but without overstepping the proved facts, . . .
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Andhra Pradesh State Electricity ... vs Andhra Pradesh Power Diploma Engineers ... on 14 June, 1994

In K. C. P. E. Association, Madras v. K. C. P. Ltd. (supra), it was held that in Industrial law, interpreted and applied in the perspective of Part IV of the Constitution, the benefit of reasonable doubt on law and facts, if there be such doubt, must go to the weaker section, labour. There, the subject matter was a bonus dispute between the Management and the workmen revolving round the applicability of the proviso to Section 3 of Payment of Bonus Act.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next