Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.28 seconds)
Documents citing V. Venkata Bharani vs High Court Of Andhra Pradesh And Anr. on 16 October, 2001

K. Swarna Kumari, Subordinate Judge ... vs Govt. Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its ... on 6 February, 2006

It requires to be noticed that in Venkata Bharani (2 supra), one of the apparent reasons for the Full Bench declining grant of relief to the petitioner on application of doctrine of prejudice, was that the petitioner did not raise either the question of violation of principles of natural justice at any stage nor had put forth any grievance as regards procedural fairness. The only grievance was that the enquiry was conducted under nonexistent and repealed rules and therefore the punishment awarded was without jurisdiction and no independent prejudice need be established in such circumstances.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 50 - Cited by 44 - G Raghuram - Full Document

K. Swarna Kumari vs Government Of A.P. And Ors. on 29 December, 2006

Then the matter went to the Larger Bench. The Larger Bench wrote two opinions; one was written by Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari for herself and for Mr. Justice A. Gopal Reddy and Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy. Concurrent opinion was written by Mr. Justice G. Raghuram and the Court held that Venkata Bharani's case (supra) was decided in conformity with the consistent view taken by this Court as well as the Apex Court in the matter of disciplinary proceedings and further held that the prejudice doctrine can be extended to the disciplinary proceedings even where the applicable rules, in its entirety, have been ignored. It also laid down:
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - B Nazki - Full Document
1