Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 47 (1.57 seconds)
Documents citing Jaiveer Singh vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 3 May, 2023

Apu Bhowmik vs The State Of Tripura on 27 February, 2026

14. On the contrary, it was the case of the State-respondents that recruitment rule does not permit the case of the petitioners and the petitioner of WP(C) No.243 of 2025 was not in employment and in the application format, she mentioned that she was out of employment and as such, she is not entitled to get any employment in this case. In WP(C) No.242 of 2025, Learned Addl. G.A., Mr. Mangal Debbarma also reiterated the same submission made by Mr. Karnajit De, Learned Addl. G.A. in WP(C) No.243 of 2025. It was the further stand of the State-respondents that 18 months diploma obtained through NIOS by the petitioners cannot be treated as equivalent to 2 years diploma and furthermore, the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jaiveer Singh(supra) does not support the case of the petitioners. Furthermore, as per recruitment notification, there was no such condition precedent that on the date of application for the posts to be applied for, the candidate should be in employment.
Tripura High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Apu Bhowmik vs The State Of Tripura on 27 February, 2026

14. On the contrary, it was the case of the State-respondents that recruitment rule does not permit the case of the petitioners and the petitioner of WP(C) No.243 of 2025 was not in employment and in the application format, she mentioned that she was out of employment and as such, she is not entitled to get any employment in this case. In WP(C) No.242 of 2025, Learned Addl. G.A., Mr. Mangal Debbarma also reiterated the same submission made by Mr. Karnajit De, Learned Addl. G.A. in WP(C) No.243 of 2025. It was the further stand of the State-respondents that 18 months diploma obtained through NIOS by the petitioners cannot be treated as equivalent to 2 years diploma and furthermore, the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jaiveer Singh(supra) does not support the case of the petitioners. Furthermore, as per recruitment notification, there was no such condition precedent that on the date of application for the posts to be applied for, the candidate should be in employment.
Tripura High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next