Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)

Sh.Ranjit Singh Purwaha vs (1) M/S Harsha Associates Pvt.Ltd on 13 February, 2015

9. Per contra, it was urged by the learned counsel for the respondents that in view of the Supreme Court Judgment titled as Bhushan Kumar and Another Vs State of (NCT of Delhi) and Another reported as AIR 2012 SC 1747, and other judgments (Urshilla Kerkar Vs Make My Trip India Private Limited, Harish Rikhari Vs Fuji Film India Private Limited, Rainee Singh Vs State and Another, Aman Kumar Harjai Vs State) rendered by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, the learned MM has rightly used his powers and held that no prima facie case was made out against the accused and did not frame any notice u/s 251 Cr.P.C thereby dropping the proceedings against the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Jhunjhunwala vs Technology Development Board on 13 October, 2017

10 The trial Court in its order dated 06.02.2017 has relied upon the judgment of  Aman Kumar  Harjai vs State & Another  (2015  VAD  (Delhi) 187 wherein it was held that, "Needless to say, if the trial Court finds that no case is made out   against   petitioner,   then   decision   of   the   Apex   Court's   in Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal and ors. (2004) 7 SCC 338 will not stand in the way of trial Court to drop the proceedings against   the   petitioner   and   if   trial   Court   chooses   to   proceed against   petitioner,   then   petitioner   will   have   the   remedy   as Ashok Kumar Jhunjhunwala vs Technology Development Board  page no. 6 of 8 CR NO. 270/2017 available   in   the   law.   It   is   so   said   because   dropping   of proceedings at Notice stage cannot possibly be equated with recalling of summoning order."
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1