Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.84 seconds)
Documents citing Shrikant Pandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 55 Crmp/58/2018 ... on 16 January, 2018

Shrikant Panday vs Shanti Devi on 8 September, 2025

28. The complainant was examined on the document. He was evasive to answer whether Mr. Ramanuj Mishra was his brother-in-law. In the first instance, he outrightly denied the fact. Later, when a court question was put to him, he stated that 'he was not sure'. It is beyond reasonable comprehension as to how the complainant can plead not knowing his brother-in-law. It appears that the complainant was being evasive in Digitally signed by ANJALI ANJALI SINGH CT CASES 43859/2016 SHRIKANT PANDEY V. SHANTI DEVI SINGH Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Srikant Pandey vs Shanti Devi And Anr on 8 September, 2025

28. The complainant was examined on the document. He was evasive to answer whether Mr. Ramanuj Mishra was his brother-in-law. In the first instance, he outrightly denied the fact. Later, when a court question was put to him, he stated that 'he was not sure'. It is beyond reasonable comprehension as to how the complainant can plead not knowing his brother-in-law. It appears that the complainant was being evasive in Digitally signed by ANJALI ANJALI SINGH CT CASES 46078/2016 SHRIKANT PANDEY V. SHANTI DEVI SINGH Date:
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Singh vs Rajeev Chhabda on 10 February, 2023

Hence, no interference is called for in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. He has placed reliance on the decisions in the cases of S.K. Pandey v. Kailash Agrawal ( M.Cr.C. No.53434 of 2019 decided on 13.01.2020), Lal Sahab v. The State of MP ( M.Cr.C. No.2191 of 2015 decided on 10.03.2016) and order dated 09.04.2019 passed in M.Cr.C. No.9908 of 2019.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - A Palo - Full Document
1