Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.65 seconds)

Ebera Nwanaforo vs Ncb on 31 May, 2022

contraband of 1.900 Kgs of Methamphetamine from a black coloured Dell bag in his possession, the applicants who fall within the ambit of directions (iii) in paragraph 15 of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners (supra) and taking into account the verdict of the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Atul Aggarwal (supra), Anil Kumar @ Nillu (supra) and the Hon‟ble High Court of Calcutta in In Re; Sanawar Ali (supra) all in totality bring forth that in view of the verdict of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court applies in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing Undertrial Prisoners (supra) with the principles laid down therein having been reiterated in Thana Singh (supra) by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court, and taking into the directions in paragraph 15(iii) thereof in relation to the aspect of directions for release of undertrial prisoners falling in the category of undertrial prisoners who are charged with the offences punishable under the NDPS Act, 1985 with a minimum imprisonment of 10 years and a minimum fine of Rupees one lakh,- are entitled to be released on bail where they have been in jail for atleast 5 years, subject to terms and conditions as laid down by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court, and thus it is directed that the applicants herein i.e. Frank Vitus, the applicant of Bail Appl. No.4187/2020 and Ebera Nwanaforo, the applicant of Bail Appln. No.3705/2020 are allowed to be released on bail on their filing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, NDPS, Delhi concerned, where the trial is in progress with directions to the effect that:-
Delhi High Court Cites 69 - Cited by 3 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Anil Kumar vs Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence ... on 22 December, 2022

9. The learned Sr. SC submits that the reliance placed by the learned counsel of applicant in the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (Representing Undertrial Prisoners) v. Union of India (supra) and the judgment of this Court in Atul Aggarwal (supra) is misplaced since the facts of those cases are completely different from those of the present case and thus, the law laid down therein does not apply here.
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - A Sharma - Full Document

Anil Kumar @ Nillu vs State on 21 March, 2022

Furthermore, in Atul Agarwal v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (supra), this Court had not solely granted bail on the footing of the inordinate delay in trial, but had also considered the twin requirements stipulated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner herein is squarely covered by judgement of the Supreme Court and is entitled to release on account of inordinate delay in trial and prolonged judicial custody.
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 9 - S Prasad - Full Document

Mahender Pal vs State on 18 May, 2023

Furthermore, in Atul Agarwal v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (supra), this Court had not solely granted bail on the footing of the inordinate delay in trial, but had also considered the twin requirements stipulated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner herein is squarely covered by judgment of the Supreme Court and is entitled to release on account of inordinate delay in trial and prolonged judicial custody.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - A Sharma - Full Document

Tasawwur Hussain@ Tasawwur vs Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence on 11 November, 2022

16. The verdict of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee representing Undertrial Prisoners Vs. Union of India" (Supra) has been adhered to by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Atul Aggarwal vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (2021) SCC OnLine Del 5489, Anil Kumar @ Nillu vs. State in Bail Appln. 1724/2021, a verdict dated 21.03.2022, and the verdict of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in "In Re: Sanawar Ali" 2021 Crl.LJ. 403 and the verdicts of this Court in Bail Appln. 3705/2020 and Bail Appln.
Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Asif Ali vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 3 February, 2023

Furthermore, in Atul Agarwal v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (supra), this Court had not solely granted bail on the footing of the inordinate delay in trial, but had also considered the twin requirements stipulated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner herein is squarely covered by judgment of the Supreme Court and is entitled to release on account of inordinate delay in trial and prolonged judicial custody.
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - A Sharma - Full Document
1   2 Next