Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 50 (1.07 seconds)

N.V. Habeebu Rahman vs State Of Kerala on 17 September, 2021

16. Similarly, courts across the globe have responded to constitutional challenges to executive policies that have directly or indirectly violated rights and liberties of citizens. Courts have often reiterated the expertise of the executive in managing a public health crisis, but have also warned against arbitrary and irrational policies being excused in the garb of the "wide latitude" to the executive that is necessitated to battle a pandemic. This Court in Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha v. State of Gujarat [AIR 2020 SC 4601], albeit while speaking in the context of labour rights, had noted that policies to counteract a pandemic must continue to be evaluated from a threshold of proportionality to determine if they, inter alia, have a rational connection with the object that is sought to be achieved and are necessary to achieve them.
Kerala High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - S Manikumar - Full Document

Sanil Narayanan vs The State Of Kerala on 20 October, 2021

16. Similarly, courts across the globe have responded to constitutional challenges to executive policies that have directly or indirectly violated rights and liberties of citizens. Courts have often reiterated the expertise of the executive in managing a public health crisis, but have also warned against arbitrary and irrational policies being excused in the garb of the "wide latitude" to the executive that is necessitated to battle a pandemic. This Court in Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha v. State of Gujarat [AIR 2020 SC 4601], albeit while speaking in the context of labour rights, had noted that policies to counteract a pandemic must continue to be evaluated from a threshold of proportionality to determine if they, inter alia, have a rational connection with the object that is sought to be achieved and are necessary to achieve them.
Kerala High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - P B Kumar - Full Document

Akshay N. Patel vs Reserve Bank Of India on 6 December, 2021

In fact, one of us (Justice D Y Chandrachud), in a three-judge Bench of this Court in Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha v. State of Gujarat62 had decried the State’s tenuous claim of a public health emergency to dilute welfare conditions in labour laws. This Court had stressed that balancing individual rights against measures adopted to combat the public health crisis must continue to satisfy the test of proportionality. Justice D Y Chandrachud noted:
Supreme Court of India Cites 75 - Cited by 14 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Kusum Lata Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 25 July, 2022

18. Similarly, courts across the globe have responded to constitutional challenges to executive policies that have directly or indirectly violated rights and liberties of citizens. Courts have often reiterated the expertise of the executive in managing a public health crisis, but have also warned against arbitrary and irrational policies being excused in the garb of the "wide latitude" to the executive that is necessitated to battle a pandemic. This Court in Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha vs State of Gujarat, albeit while speaking in the context of labour rights, had noted that policies to counteract a pandemic must continue to be evaluated from a threshold of proportionality to determine if they, inter alia, have a rational connection with the object that is sought to be achieved and are necessary to achieve them.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 31 - Full Document

Ramesh Chandra Sharma vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 20 February, 2023

51. Although the fifth prong, as mentioned in the Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha (Supra) has not been expressly mentioned in Puttaswamy, Chandrachud J (as His Lordship then was), in our view, rightly has read that in in the Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha case (supra) to complete the test. State action that leaves sufficient room for abuse, thereby acting as a threat against free exercise of fundamental rights, ought to necessarily be factored in in the delicate balancing act that the judiciary is called upon to do in determining the constitutionality of such state action - whether legislative, executive, administrative or otherwise.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 125 - K Murari - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next