Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.95 seconds)
Documents citing State vs Vikas Yadav & Anr on 7 August, 2009

State vs . Vikas & Anr on 25 April, 2015

In the present case in hand cash worth Rs. 15,000/- and Rs.7,000/- was seized vide seizure memo dated 19/09/2004 and 12/10/2004 respectively and charge under Section 411 of the IPC was framed against the accused persons namely Vikas and Guddu Chaubey @ Raj Kumar on the footing that they were found in possession of the cash knowing or having reason to believe that it was stolen property. It is elementary that there can be no offence of dishonestly receiving stolen property FIR No. 324/04 Page No. 5 of 6 State Vs. Vikas & Anr unless the property which is alleged to be the subject of such receiving, answers the description of "stolen property" defined under section 410 of the IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash Yadav And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 29 August, 2024

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the order dated 15.07.2024 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court No. 1, Prayagraj in Special Case No. 67 of 2019 (State Vs. Vikash Yadav and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 05 of 2014, under Sections 376(2), 506 of I.P.C. and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Cantt., District Prayagraj, whereby the trial court rejected the application of the applicants/ accused persons under Section 311 of Cr.P.C.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S K Pachori - Full Document
1