Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Maharashtra vs Rajkumar Sitti @ Kundanlal Malhotra on 27 October, 1987

Raj Kumar Awasthi vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 October, 2024

The Metropolitan Magistrate, has referred to the Judgment of this Court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajkumar Sitti @ Kundalla Malhotra2, wherein view has been taken that considering the Notifcation issued by the State of Maharashtra in its Home Department (Special) No.S.B.I/CIA/ 1060/26963, dated 04.10.1962, as amended by (Special) S.B.I/ CIA/1061/27115 dated 10.08.1962, the offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC is cognizable and non-bailable, in the area of Greater Bombay.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - B Dangre - Full Document

Raj Kumar Awasthi vs State Of Maharashtra on 25 October, 2024

The Metropolitan Magistrate, has referred to the Judgment of this Court in the case of State of Maharashtra Vs. Rajkumar Sitti @ Kundalla Malhotra2, wherein view has been taken that considering the Notifcation issued by the State of Maharashtra in its Home Department (Special) No.S.B.I/CIA/ 1060/26963, dated 04.10.1962, as amended by (Special) S.B.I/ CIA/1061/27115 dated 10.08.1962, the offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC is cognizable and non-bailable, in the area of Greater Bombay.
Bombay High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - B Dangre - Full Document

Parasmal Uttamchandra Picha Jain vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 5 February, 2020

at sufficient length of time. He argued that the offence punishable under Part II of Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code is made cognizable by Notification of the State and this fact is clear from the Judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of State of Maharashtra v. Rajkumar @ Sitti Kundanlal Gaikwad RD 1/4 (20)APLNo.13822018.doc Malhotra1. It is also urged by the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant that investigation under direction of the learned Magistrate resorting to Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is much wider than a verification conducted by the learned Magistrate and, therefore, the impugned Order needs to be quashed and set aside.
Bombay High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A M Badar - Full Document
1