citedby: 172289343

Anil Kumar Sen vs M/O Railways on 9 July, 2019

have to be considered. Even if acquittal has been made, employer may consider nature of offence, whether acquittal is honourable or giving benefit of doubt on technical reasons and decline to appoint a person who is unfit or dubious character. In case employer comes to conclusion that conviction or ground of acquittal in criminal case would not affect the fitness for employment incumbent may be appointed or continued in service. The relevant portion in the judgment of Avatar Singh (supra) reads as under:-

Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tara Prasad Sharma vs State Of Sikkim And Others on 10 May, 2021

In the facts of the present case, the judgment of Joginder Singh (supra) having no application because the petitioner was not honourably acquitted, in fact, he was acquitted giving benefit of doubt, therefore, the said judgment is of no avail to him.

Sikkim High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - J K Maheshwari - Full Document

M.Manimuthu vs ) The Director General Of Police on 1 November, 2018

In Joginder Singh vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others reported in (2015) 2 SCC 377, an honourable acquittal in the criminal case was carved out of the guidelines, as an exception to disqualification.

Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

M.Sivan Sakthi vs ) The Director General Of Police on 4 June, 2020

In Joginder Singh vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others reported in (2015) 2 SCC 377, an honourable acquittal in the 3/15 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.(MD)Nos.11930 of 2020... etc(batch) criminal case was carved out of the guidelines, as an exception to disqualification.

Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

M.Sakthivel vs ) The Director General Of Police on 10 July, 2020

In Joginder Singh vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others reported in (2015) 2 SCC 377, an honourable acquittal in the 3/17 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD)Nos.8072 of 2020...etc(batch) criminal case was carved out of the guidelines, as an exception to disqualification.

Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

Sonu Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 27 May, 2021

The judgments relied upon on behalf of the petitioner in Joginder Singh's case (supra) and Pawan Kumar's case (supra) would have no applicability to the facts of the present case.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Commissioner Of Police vs Raj Kumar on 25 August, 2021

15. There are subsequent judgments too in this regard which have followed the ruling in Joginder Singh v. Union Territory of Chandigarh & Ors 3; Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration & Ors v. Pradeep Kumar & Anr4 and Anil Bhardwaj v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh5.

Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 102 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Deepu Kumar Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 October, 2021

(15) The Supreme Court in the case of Joginder Singh Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and others, reported in (2015) 2 SCC 377 has also discussed a case, in which, a candidate was found unsuitable as he was tried for a charge under Section 376 of IPC, but later on acquitted. In the same circumstance a person tried under Sections 294, 504 and 34 of IPC, but acquitted and has been appointed. Thus, that discrimination was deprecated by the Supreme Court directing reconsideration of the case of the employee. (16) In the present case also, if situation has been clarified by the petitioner annexing a list Annexure-P-11 showing that some persons have been appointed, though faced criminal charges, but have been acquitted later on, then the petitioner cannot be discriminated in such manner.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Between vs Superintendent Of Police on 13 August, 2021

(Emphasis laid by this Court) After examining the principles laid down in the above said case, the same was reiterated by this Court in a recent decision in the case of Joginder Singh v. Union Territory of Chandigarh & Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 2325 Of 2009 (decided on November 11, 2014.

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

B. Maheswar Pattnaik vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ... on 23 September, 2022

(Emphasis laid by this Court) After examining the principles laid down in the above said case, the same was reiterated by this Court in a recent decision in the case of Joginder Singh v. Union Territory of Chandigarh & Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 2325 Of 2009 (decided on November 11, 2014.

Orissa High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results