Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (4.14 seconds)
Documents citing Bombay Environmental Action Group, A ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 17 October, 2005

Mariyayi Machhimaar Sahkari Sanstha ... vs Department Of Fisheries Thr. ... on 12 August, 2021

57. Further, we agree with the Amicus Curiae's submission that destruction PA-Nitin Jagtap 39 / 54 WP-2016-2021.doc of mangroves for TCB III will disturb the ecological balance in Thane Creek. The vital role that mangroves play in maintaining ecological balance and sustaining biodiversity is well documented. The Thane Creek Flamengo Sanctuary Management Plan and The Preliminary Report on Biodiversity of Thane Creek, which are discussed above also bear out that the destruction of mangroves often results, inter alia, in loss of biodiversity, and reduced fish catch, which in turn would impact livelihood of the Project Affected Fishermen. The judgment in Bombay Environmental Action Group v. State of Maharashtra (supra) of this Court, elucidates the importance of mangroves on the ecology. The judgment states, at paragraph 32:
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parisar vs Pune Municipal Corporation on 26 November, 2012

He submitted that in the case of Bombay Environmental Action Group Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in 2001 (4) Mh.L.J 260 the construction of bridges is not considered as a substantial modification under Section 37 of the MRTP Act. While deleting the road on the other side of the bank of the river which was earlier shown in Final Development Plan, Corporation took steps contemplated under Section 37 of the MRTP Act. However, it is not necessary for the Corporation to take steps under Section 37 of the MRTP Act while constructing a new road.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - M Bhatkar - Full Document

K.V. Kurundkar And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 2 May, 2019

In Bombay Environmental Action Group (supra), the Division Bench of this Court has directed the registration of offence by the police officer under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. This Public Interest Litigation was in respect of saving mangroves, as they are essential part of the environment. In the said PIL, the Division Bench has ordered total freeze of destruction and cutting of mangroves in entire Maharashtra and directed the preservation of mangroves in various ways.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - M Bhatkar - Full Document

Environment Department And Anr vs The State Of Mahrashtra And Anr on 2 May, 2019

In Bombay Environmental Action Group (supra), the Division Bench of this Court has directed the registration of offence by the police officer under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. This Public Interest Litigation was in respect of saving mangroves, as they are essential part of the environment. In the said PIL, the Division Bench has ordered total freeze of destruction and cutting of mangroves in entire Maharashtra and directed the preservation of mangroves in various ways.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - M Bhatkar - Full Document

Godrej & Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. vs State Of Maharashtra . on 30 January, 2014

35. On enquiries made by Godrej subsequent to the receipt of the stop- work notices, it came to be known that the Bombay High Court had given a direction on 22nd June 2005 in PIL No. 17/2002 (Bombay Environment Action Group v. State of Maharashtra) on the claim of the petitioner therein that in the entire State of Maharashtra the land records were incomplete and a large number of problems were encountered because of not updating the land records which in any event is also an obligation on the State. Accordingly, the High Court gave a direction granting time to the State of Maharashtra up to 31st May 2006 to complete the entire land records in the State and further directed that quarterly reports regarding the progress of the work be filed before the Registrar General of the High Court.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - M B Lokur - Full Document

The National High Speed Rail ... vs State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 9 December, 2022

83. Further, the decision of this Court in the case of Bombay Environmental Action Group (supra) not only highlights these principles, but also reinforces the trust that the public reposes in the Courts, when in paragraph 83 (viii), it observes that the mangroves cannot be permitted to be destructed by the State for private, commercial or any other use unless the Court fnds it necessary for the public good or public interest. The Courts therefore need to be fully aware and conscious of its responsibility as a guardian of public good and public interest.
Bombay High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Godrej & Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 30 January, 2014

35. On enquiries made by Godrej subsequent to the receipt of the stop- work notices, it came to be known that the Bombay High Court had given a direction on 22nd June 2005 in PIL No. 17/2002 (Bombay Environment Action Group v. State of Maharashtra) on the claim of the petitioner therein that in the entire State of Maharashtra the land records were incomplete and a large number of problems were encountered because of not updating the land records which in any event is also an obligation on the State. Accordingly, the High Court gave a direction granting time to the State of Maharashtra up to 31st May 2006 to complete the entire land records in the State and further directed that quarterly reports regarding the progress of the work be filed before the Registrar General of the High Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 37 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Maharashtra Pollution Control Board ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 2 May, 2019

In Bombay Environmental Action Group (supra), the Division Bench of this Court has directed the registration of offence by the police officer under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. This Public Interest Litigation was in respect of saving mangroves, as they are essential part of the environment. In the said PIL, the Division Bench has ordered total freeze of destruction and cutting of mangroves in entire Maharashtra and directed the preservation of mangroves in various ways.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - M Bhatkar - Full Document

Maharashtra State Road Development And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 2 May, 2019

In Bombay Environmental Action Group (supra), the Division Bench of this Court has directed the registration of offence by the police officer under sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986. This Public Interest Litigation was in respect of saving mangroves, as they are essential part of the environment. In the said PIL, the Division Bench has ordered total freeze of destruction and cutting of mangroves in entire Maharashtra and directed the preservation of mangroves in various ways.
Bombay High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - M Bhatkar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next