Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Asma Khanum @ Noor Asma vs State Of Karnataka By on 9 July, 2020

Prakash And Ors vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr on 14 February, 2025

9. This Court in the case of ASMA KHANUM @ NOOR ASMA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER4 has held that when the material on record would go to show that the accused, who are close relatives of husband, are married and residing separately and when the complaint lacks specific allegations so as to implicate the accused for the offences alleged against them, such criminal prosecution shall not be allowed to continue.
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S V Shetty - Full Document

Mohammed Ayaz Shaikh vs The Staet By Banasawadi Police Station on 1 July, 2021

10. This Court in the case of ASMA KHANUM @ NOOR ASMA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER - 2020(6) KAR.L.J.90 has also held that when the material on record would go to show that the petitioners who are close relations of husband, are married and residing separately and when the complaint lacks specific allegations so as to implicate the petitioners for the offences alleged against them, 11 Crl.P.No.1497/2021.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S V Shetty - Full Document

Ameet And Ors vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr on 1 February, 2025

8. This Court in the case of ASMA KHANUM @ NOOR ASMA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER4 has held that when the material on record would go to show that the petitioners, who are close relatives of husband, are married and residing separately and when the complaint lacks specific allegations so as to implicate the petitioners for the offences alleged against them, such criminal prosecution shall not be allowed to continue.
Karnataka High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S V Shetty - Full Document

Khamarunnisa And Ors vs The State Through And Anr on 3 February, 2025

9. This Court in the case of ASMA KHANUM @ NOOR ASMA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER4 has held that when the material on record would go to show that the petitioners, who are close relatives of husband, are married and residing separately and when the complaint lacks specific allegations so as to implicate the petitioners for the offences alleged against them, such criminal prosecution shall not be allowed to continue.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S V Shetty - Full Document

Pranesh And Ors vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr on 10 February, 2025

9. This Court in the case of ASMA KHANUM @ NOOR ASMA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER4 has held that when the material on record would go to show that the petitioners, who are close relatives of husband, are married and residing separately and when the complaint lacks specific allegations so as to implicate the petitioners for the offences alleged against them, such criminal prosecution shall not be allowed to continue.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S V Shetty - Full Document

Mumtaj Begum vs The State Of Karnataka And Anr on 25 February, 2025

8. This Court in the case of ASMA KHANUM @ NOOR ASMA & OTHERS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANOTHER4 has held that when the material on record would go to show that the petitioners, who are close relatives of husband, are married and residing separately and when the complaint lacks specific allegations so as to implicate the petitioners for the offences alleged against them, such criminal prosecution shall not be allowed to continue.
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S V Shetty - Full Document
1