Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.97 seconds)

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited vs Khao Gali Restaurants Private Limited & ... on 23 August, 2024

72. Reliance placed on Standard Chartered Bank (supra) is also misplaced as the case of the defendant therein was based on the fraud committed by the plaintiffs therein and had caused a wrongful loss to the defendant therein. Based on the report of Comptroller and Auditor General of India and Central Vigilance Commission, the Court therein was of the view that the case requires full scale trial on oral and documentary evidence whereas in the present case, there is no such report. In addition, the said judgment does not deal with the principles for grant/rejection of leave to defend and the observations made are in the passing.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Ashwin Khater And Anr vs Avinash Khater And 3 Ors on 13 July, 2021

2. Now, Defendant No.1's counsel seeks further time; he needs 10 to 12 days. He submits that the time limit of 10 days as set out in Rule 3 of Order 37 CPC does not apply to V.A. Tikam 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 15/07/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2021 21:20:53 ::: 13.07.2021_SJ_8_of_2021.docx the High Court of Bombay. According to him, Rule 221 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules does not contemplate any such a timeframe, and that Rule prevails Rule 3 of Order 37. To support his contention, he relies on Standard Chartered Bank vs. ICICI Lombard General Insurance, decided on 1st September 2017.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - D S Naidu - Full Document
1