Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing Amit Meharia vs Commissioner Of Police & Ors. on 17 August, 2021

Suman Kanwar vs North Western Railway on 27 September, 2021

Be that as it may, the Commission observes that the information sought in the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party which is exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act. However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nitesh Kumar Sharma vs North Western Railway on 5 October, 2021

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought by the Appellant pertains to personal information of a third party which is exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. The Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sarita Sahu vs South East Central Railway on 3 December, 2021

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought in the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party which is exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act. The Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chetan Khandelwal vs West Central Railway on 3 December, 2021

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought in the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. However, since the Appellant is contesting the same, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Priya Tushar Mahajan vs Central Railway on 17 December, 2021

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that the information sought in the instant RTI Application pertains to personal information of a third party which is exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act. Yet, the Respondent after receiving the hearing notice from the Commission has provided certain documents/information to the Appellant. The Commission sternly cautions the Respondent public authority to be careful in future and shall strictly adhere to the specific exemption clauses mentioned at Section 8 and 9 of the RTI Act. Be that as it may, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the recent judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Monalisa Das vs Food Corporation Of India on 16 March, 2022

Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that Shri Pushpendra Singh has expressed his dissent from disclosing the averred information to the Appellant vide letter dated 25.03.2020. Be that as it may, the Commission finds it pertinent to rely upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide W.P.(C) 2211/2021 & CM APPL.16337/2021 in the matter of Amit Meharia versus Commissioner of Police & Ors. decided on 17.08.2021, wherein the Hon'ble High Court has categorically held as under:
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next