Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 329 (0.54 seconds)
Documents citing Bharat vs State Of M.P on 30 January, 2003

Bharat Manje vs State Of M.P. on 14 September, 2021

(Bharat Vs. State of M. P.) -4- in nature, investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed, victim was also discharged from the hospital after four days of treatment and also looking to the fact that the applicants are young persons of 22 and 19 years of age and the final conclusion of the trial is likely to take long sufficient time. I deem it proper to release the applicants on bail. Therefore, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Verma - Full Document

Bharat @ Bhaarat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 21 November, 2017

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions raised on behalf of the parties by their counsel and upon the M.Cr.C.No.19830/2017 Bharat alias Bharat vs. State of M.P. perusal of all the material on record, but without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to applicant Bharat with certain conditions. Hence, the application is allowed. The applicant is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 07.12.2017 for interrogations and submission of documentary proofs of his permanent residential address and contact numbers, if any. The Investigating Officer is ordered that if he arrests the applicant in the case, in that event he will release him on bail immediately upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/-(forty Thousand) with one solvent surety of the same amount to his/her satisfaction. Further, the applicant will abide by the conditions enumerated in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that if the applicant fails to appear before the Investigating Officer within the stipulated time period, then this bail order shall stand automatically cancelled in respect of him.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sattatiya @ Satish Rajanna Kartalla vs State Of Maharashtra on 16 January, 2008

It is now well settled that with a view to base a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish all the pieces of incriminating circumstances by reliable and clinching evidence and the circumstances so proved must form such a chain of events as would permit no conclusion other than one of guilt of the accused. The circumstances cannot be on any other hypothesis. It is also well settled that suspicion, however grave it may be, cannot be a substitute for a proof and the courts shall take utmost precaution in finding an accused guilty only on the basis of the circumstantial evidence. At this stage, we also deem it proper to observe that in exercise of power under Article 136 of the Constitution, this Court will be extremely loath to upset the judgment of conviction which is confirmed in appeal. However, if it is found that the appreciation of evidence in a case, which is entirely based on circumstantial evidence, is vitiated by serious errors and on that account miscarriage of justice has been occasioned, then the Court will certainly interfere even with the concurrent findings recorded by the trial court and the High Court  Bharat vs. State of M.P. [(2003) 3 SCC 106].
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 226 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Bharat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 March, 2021

In view of the COVID-19, jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, medical examination of applicant shall be undertaken by the jail doctor and on prima facie, if it is found that he is 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No.14177/2021 (Bharat vs. State of M.P.) having the symptoms of COVID-19, then consequential follow up action including the isolation/quarantine or any test if required, be ensured, otherwise applicant shall be released immediately on bail and shall be given a pass or permit for movement to reach his place of residence.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next