Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)

G. Madanlal vs P. Padma Bai on 16 December, 1986

4. Mr. Raghupathi, in his turn, by relying upon the decision in Lala Lalsingh v. Seth Shobhagchand , would plead, that after the amendment effected to Section 115, C.P.C., under Central Act 104 of 1976, neither the earlier decision in Maj S.S. Khanna v. Brig F.J. Dhilion A.I.R. 1964 S.C. 497, nor the other decisions referred to in that decision, could he of any avail to defendant. He submits that, as soon as the decree had been passed, there is no power to deal with any of the conditional or interlocutory orders, passed pending disposal of the suit; and the only course open to defendant is to look for remedies by way of appeal.
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1