Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.83 seconds)

Chandra Shekhar vs State Of U.P. And on 5 April, 2023

By means of the present petition the petitioner has challenged the orders dated 11.10.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, Saharanpur in Sessions Trial No. 212 of 2018 (State Vs. Chandra Shekhar), P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Saharanpur, Sessions Trial No. 214 of 2018 (State Vs. Chandra Shekhar), P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Saharanpur, Sessions Trial No. 216 of 2018 (State Vs. Chandra Shekhar), P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Saharanpur by which applications of the petitioner for permission of issuance of passport were rejected on the ground pendency of criminal cases, as well as on the ground that offence in questions are related to public importance and also effect on law and order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Krishna And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 May, 2025

In the light of the judgments rendered by coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Munshi Lal and Another (supra) and the observation made above, proceedings initiated at the behest of opposite party no. 2 against the applicants is not sustainable in the eye of law and the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 1175 of 2023 (State vs. Shekhar and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 68 of 2023, under sections 3/5 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and Section 448 of IPC, P.S. Sakrauli, District Etah, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate/Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalesar, Etah are hereby set-aside.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Chandra Shekhar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 21 November, 2023

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that on the date fixed 10.10.2023 the applicant who is the accused in S.T. No.2334 of 2022 (State v. Chandra Shekhar) was on his duty at Lucknow as the case was fixed for evidence of prosecution, the counsel for the accused could not appear before the Court for unavoidable reasons and the learned trial Court has dismissed the application of exemption moved on behalf of the applicant and bail bonds were forfeited and the NBW has been issued. It is submitted that the applicant desires to appear before the court seeking cancellation of NBW and furnish fresh bail bonds, if so directed by the Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandra Shekhar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 9 August, 2024

7. Keeping in mind the position of law and facts, circumstances of the case, the entire proceedings of Special Case No.189 of 2019 (State Vs. Chandra Shekhar), arising out Case Crime No.63 of 2013, under Section 354A IPC and Section 3(1)10 of SC/ST Act, Police Station Marka, District Banda alongwith chargesheet dated 30.06.2013 and cognizance/summoning order dated 25.09.2019, are hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Chandrashekhar And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 27 February, 2025

7. Till the verification is done in the compromise application so submitted by the parties, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.192 of 2022 (State of U.P. Vs. Chandra Shekhar and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 133 of 2021 under Sections 323/34, 504, 506, 332, 353 IPC read with Section 3(2)Va of SC/ST (P.A.) Act, 1989 (Amended-2015) P.S. Todifatehpur, District Jhansi, pending in the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jhansi. The protection accorded to the applicants is only available subject to compliance of the terms and conditions and timeline as provided herein and in case of default, the order shall stand vacated without reference to the Bench. The parties are free to take legal recourse post outcome of the compromise. The issue of deposit of the compensation by the victim shall also be looked into.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shekhar @ Chandra Shekhar vs State Of U.P. And Another on 14 May, 2026

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstance, chargesheet dated 21.02.2022 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 03.06.2022 and entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.7289 of 2022 (State Vs. Shekhar), arising out of Case Crime No.02 of 2022, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, P.S. Gyanpur, District Bhadohi, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, are hereby set aside.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Kirtiman Alias Kirtiman Singh And ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And ... on 1 June, 2022

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the summoning order dated 05.04.2022 and charge sheet dated 02.09.2021 arising out of Case Crime No.0292 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 354(Ka), 427, 452 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act, Police Station Kandhai, District Pratapgarh in Sessions Trial No.0211 of 2022 (State vs. Shekhar and other) pending in the court of learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Pratapgarh against the applicants.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sarevan @ Chandra Shekhar And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home ... on 11 November, 2025

"(i) quash the impugned Charge Sheet No. 20/2011, dated 01.11.2011, as well as entire proceeding arising out of SC./S.T. No. 36/2013, Case Crime No. 423/2011, U/S- 323, 325, 504, 506, I.P.C. & Sect. 3 (1) X SC./ST. Act. P.S. Ahirauli, District - Ambedkar Nagar, state of U.P. Vs Sarevan @ Chandra Shekhar & other, through compromise is contained herewith as Annexure No.1 to this petition."
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next