Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Kerala vs A.A.Ali on 14 August, 2018

Sat Pal vs State Of Haryana on 23 May, 2019

In view of the judgment rendered in State of Kerala Vs. A.A. Ali (supra)., these petitions are partly allowed and it is directed that instead of furnishing bank guarantee of ` 8,00,000/- (rupees eight lakhs only) each, two solvent sureties of the equivalent amount will be furnished and the petitioners will hand-over the registration certificate with the Investigating Agency along with an undertaking that the registration certificate of the same vehicle(s) will remain in possession of the Court and petitioner(s) will not sell or alienate the cars by creating third-party interest during the pendency of the trial.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A S Sangwan - Full Document

Amit vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2019

2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 03-10-2019 02:43:18 ::: -3- In view of the judgment rendered in State of Kerala Vs. A.A. Ali (supra), present petition is partly allowed and it is directed that instead of furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.8,00,000/- (rupees eight lakhs only), two solvent sureties of the equivalent amount will be furnished and the petitioner will hand-over the registration certificate with the Investigating Agency along with an undertaking that the registration certificate of the same vehicle will remain in possession of the Court and petitioner will not sell or alienate the car by creating third-party interest during the pendency of the trial.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Dhawan - Full Document

Shamsher Singh vs State Of Haryana on 23 May, 2019

In view of the judgment rendered in State of Kerala Vs. A.A. Ali (supra)., these petitions are partly allowed and it is directed that instead of furnishing bank guarantee of ` 8,00,000/- (rupees eight lakhs only) each, two solvent sureties of the equivalent amount will be furnished and the petitioners will hand-over the registration certificate with the Investigating Agency along with an undertaking that the registration certificate of the same vehicle(s) will remain in possession of the Court and petitioner(s) will not sell or alienate the cars by creating third-party interest during the pendency of the trial.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A S Sangwan - Full Document

Dnyaneshwar @ Mauli Ananda Rasal vs The State Of Maharashtra on 2 July, 2019

Therefore, keeping in view the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunderbhai Desai (supra) and also in the case of ::: Uploaded on - 03/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 04/07/2019 01:03:52 ::: Bhagyawant 4/4 jud apl 197-19 State of Kerala (supra), the ends of justice would be met in case Additional Sessions Judge is directed to reconsider the prayer of the applicant for release of aforesaid vehicle.
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S S Shinde - Full Document

Sukhdev Singh Alias Kala vs State Of Punjab on 16 November, 2022

As stated, the vehicle in question is no longer required by the police and if it remains in their custody, shall loose its value and utility. The vehicle being the only source of income of family of the petitioner, who in absence of it, is suffering heavy financial loss but being a poor person, is unable to furnish the cash/ bank guarantee for its release and in place of the same, is ready to furnish adequate solvent surety of the equal amount in the shape of property. Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Kerala vs. A.A.Ali, 2018 (4) RCR (Crl.) 112 had held that 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 22-11-2022 22:12:10 ::: CRM-M-48284-2022 3 the Courts should not insist on furnishing of the bank guarantee in such like cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sukhpal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 15 December, 2022

As stated, the vehicle in question is no longer required by the police and if it remains in their custody, shall loose its value and utility. The vehicle being the only source of income of family of the petitioner, who in absence of it, is suffering heavy financial loss but being a poor person, is unable to furnish the cash/ bank guarantee for its release and in place of the same, is ready to furnish adequate solvent surety of the equal amount in the shape of property. Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Kerala vs. A.A.Ali, 2018 (4) RCR (Crl.) 112 had held that the Courts should not insist on furnishing of the bank guarantee in such like cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sumit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 January, 2023

As stated, the vehicle in question is no longer required by the police and if it remains in their custody, shall loose its value and utility. The petitioner, being a poor person, is unable to furnish the cash/bank guarantee for its release and in place of the same, is ready to furnish adequate solvent surety of the equal amount in the shape of property. Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Kerala Vs. A. A. Ali, 2018 (4) RCR (Crl.) 112 had held that the Court should not insist on furnishing of the Bank guarantee in such like cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gurlal Singh @ Pritpal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 24 May, 2023

5. As stated, the vehicle in question is no longer required by the police and if it remains in their custody, shall loose its value and utility. The petitioner is a very poor person and is unable to furnish the cash/ bank guarantee for its release and in place of the same, is ready to furnish the personal bond and an additional security bond of Rs.2,00,000/-. Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Kerala vs. A.A.Ali, 2018 (4) RCR (Crl.) 112 had held that the Courts should not insist on furnishing of the bank guarantee in such like cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yadwinder Sharma @ Happy vs State Of Punjab on 1 June, 2023

6. As stated, the vehicle in question is no longer required by the police and if it remains in their custody, shall loose its value and utility. The petitioner is a very poor person and is unable to furnish the cash/ bank guarantee for its release and in place of the same, is ready to furnish the personal bonds and an additional security bonds of Rs.3,00,000/-. Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in the case of "State of Kerala vs. A.A.Ali", 2018 (4) RCR (Crl.) 112 had held that the Courts should not insist on furnishing of the bank guarantee in such like cases.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Bhardwaj - Full Document
1   2 Next