Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.03 seconds)
Documents citing P.Sakthi Kumar vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 8 January, 2019

Ganesh Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 June, 2025

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner apart from the averments made in the petition while placing reliance in the matter of P. Sakthi Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others reported in SLP (C) No.30700 of 2024 dated 02.05.2025 in alternate had argued that when the very termination of the petitioner from services was set aside by this Court and in pursuance thereof he was reinstated, then the petitioner was required to be considered for promotion from the date of his entitlement, but since the same has not been done, directions are required to be issued to the respondents to conduct 7 pre promotion test for the petitioner and in case he clears the said test, he may be promoted at par with respondents No.5 and 6.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M R Phadke - Full Document

Raj Kumar And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others on 17 February, 2026

17. So far as right of an employee for promotion is concerned, the position in law is by now well settled as per which the limited right with the employee is to be considered for promotion, and that there is no vested right as such for promotion. Reference in this regard can be made to the judgment of the Supreme Court in P. Sakthi vs The Government of Tamil Nadu and others, 2025 INSC 620.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1