Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.47 seconds)

Imbichikoya.E.P vs State Of Kerala Rep. By Public on 8 February, 2011

3. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that Section 341 of the Code provides an appeal against the order passed under Section 340 of the Code and the consequent complaint preferred and hence petitioner has to exercise the statutory remedy available to him. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on the decisions in P.K.Damodaran v. P.K.Bharathan (2004(1) KLJ 105), Mohan v. State of Kerala (2005 (2) KLT 714), Sagar v. State of Kerala (2006(1) KLT 69), Kuttiah v. Federal Bank Ltd. (2006(3) KLT 418) and Popular Muthiah v. State represented by Inspector of Police ((2006 7 SCC 296). According to the learned counsel, when the order under challenge is palpably wrong provision for filing appeal under Section 341 of the Code does not prevent this Court from exercising inherent power under Section 482 of the Code, since the said provision starts with a non-obstante clause.
Kerala High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - T Joseph - Full Document

Imbichikoya.E.P vs State Of Kerala Rep. By Public on 8 February, 2011

3. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that Section 341 of the Code provides an appeal against the order passed under Section 340 of the Code and the consequent complaint preferred and hence petitioner has to exercise the statutory remedy available to him. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on the decisions in P.K.Damodaran v. P.K.Bharathan (2004(1) KLJ 105), Mohan v. State of Kerala (2005 (2) KLT 714), Sagar v. State of Kerala (2006(1) KLT 69), Kuttiah v. Federal Bank Ltd. (2006(3) KLT 418) and Popular Muthiah v. State represented by Inspector of Police ((2006 7 SCC 296). According to the learned counsel, when the order under challenge is palpably wrong provision for filing appeal under Section 341 of the Code does not prevent this Court from exercising inherent power under Section 482 of the Code, since the said provision starts with a non-obstante clause.
Kerala High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - T Joseph - Full Document
1