Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.28 seconds)

Vale Australia Pty Limited vs Steel Authority Of India Limited & Anr. on 30 March, 2012

In this regard reliance is placed on the decisions in Babulal Badriprasad Varma v. Surat Municipal Corporation AIR 2008 SC 2919 and Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel 2006 (33) PTC 281; Provash Chandra Dalui v. Biswanath Banerjee AIR 1989 SC 1834; M. Gangareddy v. The State of A.P. 1996 (3) ALT 53 and Pradip Kumar Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal (1997) 2 Cal LT 4 (HC).

Ivrcl Navayugasew Jv vs State Of Telangana on 29 January, 2025

8. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court in this writ petition on 22.12.2023 and time granted vide interim orders in C.C. No.120 of 2024, in total an amount of Rs.67,79,19,306/- (rupees sixty seven crores seventy nine lakhs nineteen thousand three hundred and six only) has been paid to the petitioner out of Rs.80.26 crores, and without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to claim the balance amount, the petitioner received the said amount. However, the petitioner is entitled to interest on the admitted amount which was delayed. It is submitted that the petitioner cannot be relegated to Civil Court in view of the decisions in M. Gangareddy v. State of A.P. 1, J. Devender Ready v. Kakatiya University 2 and also unreported decisions of this Court in W.P. Nos.12677 of 2023 and 12825 of 2023 dated 03.10.2023.
Telangana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B V Reddy - Full Document
1