citedby: 175104903

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune vs Dr. Kasliwal Medical Care And Research ... on 21 October, 2024

34. Having taken the aforesaid view, we are not persuaded to accept the contention as urged by Mr. Mundhra relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in (i) Sundeep Kumar Bafna Vs. State of Maharashtra (supra), (ii) National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi (supra), and (iii) Union Territory of Ladakh Vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (supra) as such decisions do not consider the decision of the Supreme Court in Harshit Foundation Sehmalpur (supra).

Bombay High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - G S Kulkarni - Full Document

Kotapati Venkata Sai Krishnan Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kolluru V D K Kavya vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lakkaraju Venkatesh vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Seshu Sri Likhya vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chereddy Amarnath Reddy vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anagoni Dharani Priya vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Budavarapu Shreya vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pakalapati Sai Manikanta Pranay Varma vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chalasani Kavya Siva Kumari vs The State Of Telangana on 17 December, 2024

65. We may refer to another well-settled legal principle that this Court is required to decide the matter on the basis of law as it stands and it is not open, unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court to await the outcome of the reference [See: Union Territory of Ladakh vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference 48].

Telangana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results