Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21956 (4.02 seconds)

Damor Sumitraben Jayeshbhai vs Durgashankar Kaniram Shankar Deleted on 21 July, 2022

The claimants would be entitled for Rs.15,000/- each under the heads of funeral expenses and loss of estate respectively; and Rs.2,00,000/- under the head of loss of consortium in view of the judgment in the case of Magma General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors. reported in (2018) A.C.J. 2782. Thus, in all, the claimants would be entitled for Rs.17,42,000/-. The Tribunal has already awarded Rs.9,16,400/- as compensation and thus, the claimants would be entitled for enhanced compensation of Rs.8,25,600/-.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G Gopi - Full Document

Dalsingh vs Mohd.Gulfam on 22 December, 2023

It Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR NAIR Signing time: 12/22/2023 5:35:10 PM 40 also apparent from above that decisions in Magma General Insurance Company Ltd, Satinder Kaur, Somvati, Janabai, Rajbala, Smt. Anjali, Harpreet Kaur (supra) have been rendered after extensively referring & discussing Pranay Sethi (supra) & decision in Satinder Kaur (supra) is a 3 judge bench decision.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - A K Paliwal - Full Document

Smt. Anita And Ors. vs Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. ... on 13 December, 2021

"87. Insofar as the conventional heads are concerned, the deceased Satpal Singh left behind a widow and three children as his dependants. On the basis of the judgments in Pranay Sethi [National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680 : (2018) 3 SCC (Civ) 248 : (2018) 2 SCC (Cri) 205] and Magma General [Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram, (2018) 18 SCC 130 : (2019) 3 SCC (Civ) 146 : (2019) 3 SCC (Cri) 153] , the following amounts are awarded under the conventional heads:
Allahabad High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Balwinder Kaur Etc vs Gurthakur Singh And Ors on 10 March, 2025

21. So far as the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (supra) is concerned, a perusal of the above said judgment would show that Hon'ble Supreme Court has not discussed or distinguished the earlier judgments in Magma General Insurance Company Limited, Satinder Kaur alias Satwinder Kaur (3 judge bench), Somwati, Janabai, Raj Bala, Smt. Anjali and Harpreet Kaur (supra).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhuri Devi And Anr vs Virender Yadav And Ors on 10 August, 2023

be entitled for the following reliefs as per the law discussed in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. decided in Special Leave Petition Civil no. 25590 of 2014 and Megma General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram and Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 wherein the extent of the claim under different heads was discussed in detail and it was held that following amounts shall be considered as just and reasonable award under the heads i.e., Loss of Consortium, Funeral expenses and loss of Estate. Funeral expenses and loss of estate has been limited to the extent of Rs. 15,000/- each subject to enhancement of Rs. 10% of every three year since the judgment in the above said judgment (Supra).
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Dilip Patel on 2 July, 2024

As per 'Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanu, reported in AIR Online 2018 SC 189, the claimant is further entitled for Rs.40,000/- for love and affection. Hence, total compensation comes to Rs.3,85,000/- whereas the Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.3,86,000/-. Therefore, affirming the impugned award passed by the Claims Tribunal, the present appeal is dismissed.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next