Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.89 seconds)

Naresh Tyagi vs State & Ors on 3 December, 2025

In the case of Niyamavedi vs. CBI, extensive reference at some length had been made to the material disclosed in the course of investigation to examine the contention of alleged involvement of the Respondent in the crime while writing the judgment. It was observed that if Case Diary is shown or is called by the Court, it should refrain from making a reference to it in its Order. It was further observed that the limited use can be made of the statement of the Police and the Police diaries even in the course of trial as set out in Section 162 and 172 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, the Court must refrain from disclosing in its Order, material contained in the Diaries and the statements especially when the investigation of the case is in progress.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Bakhashi Ram And Others vs Satwant Singh Manak And Others on 26 November, 2013

39. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 also referred to a judgment in case Niyamavedi Vs. Director, C.B.I. New Delhi 1990 Cr.L.J. Kerala, 2231 where directions had been issued for F.I.Rs. to be registered and the Central Bureau of Investigation to carry out the investigation to find out whether there was any genuine encounter or not. Sharma Ravinder 2013.11.26 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No. 153 of 2008 & connected appeals
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1