Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Shri Chander Pal Singh, S/O Late Shri ... vs Union Of India (Uoi), Through Its ... on 28 February, 2003

Shyam Singh, Net Ram Chourasiya And ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 17 March, 2006

In the case of Chander Pal Singh v. Union of India (2003) Vol. II AD (Delhi) 772, it has been held that policy decision was within the domain of the parent department and it was for the said parent department to decide whether it should agree to send out its employees and also lay down parameters and on the basis of administrative convenience decide whether or not to issue no objection certificate. It was further held that the basic principle underlying deputation was/is that a person can always be repatriated to his parent department to serve at his substantive post. A deputationist cannot assert any right to claim absorption. Absorption can only be claimed as a matter of right, if it is based upon any statutory rules or some provision having force of law.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - S Khanna - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors. vs Navrang Lal on 28 April, 2010

3. Applying the ratio of Inder Pal Yadav (supra) and Bhadei (supra), the respondent shall be entitled for protection of his pay which he had been drawing in Construction Division in the grade of Rs. 3050-4590 though on repatriation, he was given the scale of Rs. 2550-3600. In the circumstances, the plea of the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the respondent is working in Group 'D' post and he will not be entitled for the pay scale of Group 'C' post on which he had worked for a long time, cannot be accepted and the decision of the Tribunal on this WP(C) 3226 of 2007 Page 6 of 7 ground cannot be faulted on the ground as has been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
1