Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 177 (0.45 seconds)
Documents citing Chief Information Commissioner vs High Court Of Gujarat on 4 March, 2020

S Muthumalai vs Ut Of Andaman & Nicobar on 6 January, 2021

Keeping in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by the Appellant as also on perusal of available records and taking into consideration the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the bench comprising Justices R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy, in the case of Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High Court of Gujarat and Another in CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1966-1967 OF 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.5840 of 2015) dated 04th March, 2020, observes that the information sought by the Appellant regarding the Court Proceedings cannot be furnished under the RTI Act, 2005 and the same should be obtained through the mechanism provided under the High Court Rules.
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - U Mahurkar - Full Document

Jaigopal Soni vs Supreme Court Of India on 29 October, 2020

Moreover, the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High Court of Gujarat and Another clearly states that certified copies of documents on the judicial side is to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the Supreme Court Rules and the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to. Furthermore, the Appellant/ Complainant could not justify existence of any malafide intent in denying him the information. Hence, no further intervention of the Commission is warranted in the instant matter.
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N P Gadhvi vs High Court Of Other States on 27 December, 2021

Having heard both the parties and on perusal of the available records, the Commission observes that the issues pertaining to accessing certified copies of documents on the judicial side has been settled by a bench comprising Justices R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Royof the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High Court of Gujarat and Another in CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1966-1967 OF 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.5840 of 2015) dated 04th March, 2020, wherein it was held that one must apply under Court Rules to get the certified copies of Court documents. The relevant para of the observations of the Court are reiterated as under:-
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bishnu Kant Thakur vs Punjab & Haryana High Court on 6 November, 2024

Furthermore, the PIO has relied upon the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chief Information Commissioner v. High Court of Gujarat Civil Appeal No. 1966- 1967 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) 5840 of 2015) dated 04 March 2020. Therefore, no malafide intention can be ascribed over the conduct of the CPIO and thus, no penal action is warranted in the matter.
Central Information Commission Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - H Samariya - Full Document

Johnson Kurian vs High Court Of Other States on 29 December, 2021

Having heard both the parties and on perusal of the available records, the Commission observes that the issues pertaining to accessing certified copies of documents on the judicial side has been settled by a bench comprising Justices R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Royof the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High Court of Gujarat and Another in CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1966-1967 OF 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.5840 of 2015) dated 04th March, 2020, wherein it was held that one must apply under Court Rules to get the certified copies of Court documents. The relevant para of the observations of the Court are reiterated as under:-
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

P K Jain vs Supreme Court Of India on 24 July, 2020

With regard to the information to be accessed/certified copies on the judicial side is to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the Supreme Court Rules and the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to, the Commission referred to the recent decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the bench comprising Justices R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy, in the case of Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High Court of Gujarat and Another in CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1966-1967 OF 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.5840 of 2015) dated 04th March, 2020, wherein it was held that one must apply under Court Rules to get the certified copies of Court documents. The relevant Para of the observations of the Court are reiterated as under:-
Central Information Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prabhaben Muljibhai Ranpariya vs State Of Gujarat on 4 August, 2025

[7.0] So far as exercise of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is concerned, as discussed, no error is committed by the learned Sessions Judge in refusing the request to provide copy Page 4 of 8 Uploaded by MR. AJAY C MENON(HC00939) on Wed Aug 06 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Aug 06 23:30:22 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/13511/2024 ORDER DATED: 04/08/2025 undefined of rojkam to the petitioner. Even, Rule 151 of the Gujarat High Court Rules, 1993 do not provide any assistance to the learned advocate for the petitioner more particularly in light of the fact that the proceedings of which certified copy is sought for, is of District Judiciary and criminal proceedings of District Judiciary are governed by Criminal Manual and civil proceedings are governed by Civil Manual. There is also a provision to provide copy of certified documents to the third party if he files an affidavit. Rule 377 of the Criminal Manual provides that, parties to any proceeding may, on application on the prescribed Court fee made to the Court having the custody of the record, obtain certified copies of any judgment, order, deposition, memorandum of evidence or any other document filed in the said proceedings. Herein, present petitioner is a third party and she has filed the said application supported by the affidavit. Even, Rule 377 of the Criminal Manual is pari materia provision to Rule 151 of the Gujarat High Court Rules. Even, discretion is given to the Presiding Officer vide Rule 504(10) of the Civil Manual which provides that in the case of a roznama, the portion of copy of which is given at the discretion of the Presiding Judge must include all the entries of a particular date or dates, accompanied with the heading and provision of Civil Manual is procedural aspect and applies in criminal matters also and same is also Chapter of Criminal Manual qua providing copies and record and custody and Rule 367(1) of the Criminal Manual provides that, subject to the provisions in this chapter, the rules in regard to the preservation and destruction of records prescribed in the Civil Manual shall apply mutatis mutandis to the criminal courts. Hence, the order dated Page 5 of 8 Uploaded by MR. AJAY C MENON(HC00939) on Wed Aug 06 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Aug 06 23:30:22 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/13511/2024 ORDER DATED: 04/08/2025 undefined 04.03.2020 passed in Civil Appeal No.1966-67 of 2020 arising out of SLP (C) No.5840 of 2015 in the matter between Chief Information Commissioner vs. High Court of Gujarat & Anr. obtained through RTI application would not would not render any assistence to the petitioner.
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M D Rajanna vs Supreme Court Of India on 21 January, 2021

Keeping in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by the both the parties and in the light of the judgements of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of The Registrar, Supreme Court of India vs R. S. Misra dated 21.112017 in WP (C) 3530/2011 and the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High Court of Gujarat and Anr. dated 04.03.2020 as also the earlier decision pronounced by the Commission in CIC/SCOFI/A/2019/638912-YS dated 29.10.2020, the Commission finds that an appropriate response as per the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 is provided by the Respondent. Hence, no further intervention of the Commission is warranted in the instant matter.
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next