citedby: 175822

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)

Documents citing Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sitla Parshad And Ors. on 7 August, 1985

Dwarika vs Biso And Ors. on 15 September, 1989

7. This court in taking the abovesaid view chose to follow the decisions of Punjab and Haryana, Bombay and Andhra Pradesh High Courts in Oriental Fire & Genl. Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Beasa Devi 1985 ACJ 1 (P&H), Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sitla Parsad 1985 ACJ 842 (P&H), Oriental Fire & Genl. Ins.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Shastri Brothers vs Parwatibai Jain And Ors. on 3 December, 1987

In Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chandigarh v. Smt Beasa Devi and Ors. it has been held that the insurance company can be saddled with the liability under Section 92A of the Act as soon as the Tribunal comes to the conclusion that the insured vehicle was involved in the accident and the correctness of other objections by the owner or the insurance company should be decided later on. The same view has been reiterated in Gattu Prabhakar and Anr. v.Thummanapalli Brahmaiah and Ors. , Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Goa v. Aleixo Fernandes and Ors. and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Chandigarh v. Sitla Parshad and Ors. .

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Rangji And Ors. on 9 March, 1989

Co. Ltd. v. Aleixo Fernandes 1986 ACJ 1137 (Bombay), Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sitla Parsad 1985 ACJ 842 (P&H), Narendra Singh v. Oriental Fire and Genl. Ins.

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

1