Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.61 seconds)
Documents citing Tula And Ors. vs Sadh And Ors. on 23 October, 1961

S.Ramu vs Dr.M.Valluvan on 15 February, 2022

16. The meaning of the phrase “relate to matter of a public nature” came up for consideration in Tula and Others Vs. Sadh and Others 3 and a Learned Judge held in paragraph 9 that it is wide enough to mean any judgment in which large section of public is interested and held that a judgment, relating to grazing rights involving three villages, as relevant under Section 42 of the Evidence Act.
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Gurumoorthi vs Mohanasundaram Rajamany on 2 August, 2022

16. The meaning of the phrase “relate to matter of a public nature” came up for consideration in Tula and Others Vs. Sadh and Others18 and a Learned 18 AIR 1962 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HP 28 36/43 Crl.R.C.No.927 of 2021 Judge held in paragraph 9 that it is wide enough to mean any judgment in which large section of public is interested and held that a judgment, relating to grazing rights involving three villages, as relevant under Section 42 of the Evidence Act.
Madras High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

Arvind Kejriwal vs Arun Jaitley & Ors on 19 October, 2016

8. Argument advanced by the learned Senior Counsel Mr.Ram Jethmalani for the petitioner is that the civil suit filed by the respondent no.1 and the criminal complaint in question are based on the same facts and allegations and thus the criminal proceedings for defamation may be stayed as per Section 309(2) of the Cr.P.C. by referring the judgments in the case of M.S. Sheriff, P.C. Damodaran Nair v. State of Madras & Ors. AIR 1954 SC 397, P.Jayappan v. S.K. Perumal AIR 1984 SC 1693, Tula and Ors. v. Sadh and Ors. AIR 1962 HP 28, Radheshyam Kejriwal v. State of West Bengal and Anr. (2011) 3 SCC 581,Dhanrajmal Gobindram & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. 1973 Cri.L.J. 1574, Bhagwandin v. Janak Lal & Anr. 1956 AWR 288, Mausam Mia v. Kashim Ali 1963 Cri.L.J. 129, Raj Kumari Debi and Anr. v. Bama Sundari Debi (1896) ILR 23 Cal 610, J.M. Lucas v. Official Assignee of Bengal AIR 1920 Cal 624, Kanhaiya Lal v. Crl.M.C. 2417/2016 Page 5 of 30 Bhagwan Das AIR 1926 All 30, N.B. Chakkathimma Reddi and Anr. v. The State of Mysore AIR 1952 Mys 37, Nandu Babu v. Rajendra Kumar 1970 Cri.L.J. 1574, Satendra Kumar Gupta v. A.B. Shorewal 1979 ACR 21, Raminder Kaur Bedi v. Jatinder Singh Bedi 1989 (16) DRJ 154, Charanjiv Partap Ahluwalia and another v. State (Delhi Admn.)
Delhi High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 1 - P S Teji - Full Document
1