Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Dropadi Devi vs Shyam Lal And Others on 18 September, 1997

Swati Devi vs State Of Up And 5 Others on 9 July, 2025

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Case No. 2508 of 2022, Computer Case No. T2022155102508 (Swati Devi Vs. Shyam Lal), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document

Swati Devi vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 9 July, 2025

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Case No. 2507 of 2022, Computer Case No. T2022155102507 (Swati Devi vs. Shyam Lal), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Smt. Sumna @ Sharda & Others on 10 April, 2015

18. Viewed thus, the total compensation amount of two awards in MAC Petition No. 58-S/2 of 2002, titled as Smt. Sumna alias Sharda & others versus Sh. Vijender Bundel alias Nittu & others, dated 25.04.2006 and MAC Petition No. 71-S/2 of 2002, titled as Dropti Devi versus Shri Mohan Lal & others, dated 03.05.2008, is to be satisfied by the insurer-Insurance Company and the compensation amount awarded in other awards, is to be satisfied by the insurer with the right of recovery. The insurer-Insurance Company is at liberty to move an application for recovery before the Tribunal.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 78 - M A Mir - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Smt. Sumna @ Sharda & Others on 10 April, 2015

18. Viewed thus, the total compensation amount of two awards in MAC Petition No. 58-S/2 of 2002, titled as Smt. Sumna alias Sharda & others versus Sh. Vijender Bundel alias Nittu & others, dated 25.04.2006 and MAC Petition No. 71-S/2 of 2002, titled as Dropti Devi versus Shri Mohan Lal & others, dated 03.05.2008, is to be satisfied by the insurer-Insurance Company and the compensation amount awarded in other awards, is to be satisfied by the insurer with the right of recovery. The insurer-Insurance Company is at liberty to move an application for recovery before the Tribunal.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document
1