Bhure Khan Warsi vs Mohd Israr on 22 December, 2023
Learned counsel for the revisionist-applicant states that when the decision in Maya Devi (supra) had stated that the first part dealt with the deposit of the amount admitted by the tenant to be due on the first hearing and the second part dealt with the law that when the relationship of tenant and landlord was denied then the monthly amount due was to be deposited whether it was admitted by the tenant or not then he submits that the Court erred in law as the payment had to be done of the admitted rent only and only when the relationship of tenant and landlord was established/admitted.