Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)

Bhure Khan Warsi vs Mohd Israr on 22 December, 2023

Learned counsel for the revisionist-applicant states that when the decision in Maya Devi (supra) had stated that the first part dealt with the deposit of the amount admitted by the tenant to be due on the first hearing and the second part dealt with the law that when the relationship of tenant and landlord was denied then the monthly amount due was to be deposited whether it was admitted by the tenant or not then he submits that the Court erred in law as the payment had to be done of the admitted rent only and only when the relationship of tenant and landlord was established/admitted.
Allahabad High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - S Varma - Full Document

Malati Sharma vs Raj Kumar Yadav on 9 November, 2022

This Court in the case of Maya Devi and Another v. Vipin Kumar Kushwaha and Another, 2016 0 Supreme (All) 3530, has very clearly held that whether defendant admits in a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment himself to be tenant or owner even if the defendants questioning the title of land lord and his right to maintain suit, he is required to pay rent in compliance of the second part of Order XV of Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 dealing with relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Vide paragraphs 5,6, 7,8 and 9 the Court has held thus:
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
1