Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Milakhraj vs Jagdish Chandra And Ors. on 19 March, 1957

Daulat Ram vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 29 August, 1959

This means that every candidate for the election of a Chairman must have at least 2 members to sponsor and endorse his candidature and that is why it seems to have been provided in Rule 14 that the election petition should be signed it least by three members. Moreover, if the law requires that an election petition should be signed by at least 3 members, it would not be proper for this Court to allow the petitioner to circumvent that law. It may be pointed out that in Milakhraj v, Jagdish Chandra, AIR 1957 Raj 293, a writ application was filed by a voter while Section 19 of the Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951, required that an election petition could be filed either by a candidate who stood for election or any 10 persons qualified to vote at the election. It was held that :
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 9 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Jiwanlal And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 28 January, 1958

4).We have therefore to see whether the provisions of the Validating Act validate whatever has been done by the Board in the matter of the imposition of Octroi tax from the 1st of July 1955. We shall first consider the question of the boundaries of the municipality. The validity of the Validating Act came up for consideration in Milakhraj v. Jagdish Chandra, (S) AIR 1957 Raj 293 and it was held that it was valid and the boundaries fixed by the Validating Act would be deemed to be the boundaries of the municipalities.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document
1