Mugli Begum &Ors vs Mir Arif & Ors on 19 May, 2023
05. Mr. Nisar Ahmad Bhat, the learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioners, vehemently argued that after this Court passed the judgment
under review, the respondents started alienating the suit property and the
learned trial Court did not entertain the application filed by the petitioners
in this behalf and further argued that this court could have modified the
relief, though in the application for grant of interim relief, only protection
of the possession was sought by the petitioners. Mr. Nissar, learned counsel
for the petitioners, further submitted that the lis was required to be protected
and he placed reliance upon the judgments: (i) (2012) 2 SCC 196; and (ii)
(2014) 8 SCC 294.