Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.61 seconds)
Documents citing Rupam Pathak vs The State Of Bihar Through C.B on 8 January, 2013

Bhola Chaubey And Anr vs The State Of Bihar on 9 June, 2020

In Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.482 of 2016(5) dt.09-06-2020 6/7 C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No.393 of 2012], the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal, a division bench of this Court vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed another interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 24 April, 2026

12. Mr. Amish Kumar, learned Advocate has submitted that this Court has well-settled tradition of treating such matters as tied-up matters where on an earlier occasion one of the Hon'ble Judges or the Hon'ble Benches has passed an order either dismissing the application on merit or allowing the Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.657 of 2024(11) dt.24-04-2026 11/23 application to be withdrawn or whether the application stands dismissed in want of prosecution. Learned counsel has referred the judgment in the case of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through C.B.I. (Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2012) wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court had been pleased to reject the prayer for bail giving some reasons whereafter Rupam Pathak made a fresh prayer for bail before the High Court, a Division Bench of the High Court had granted the bail. The order granting bail was taken to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 1836 of 2013 arising out of SLP (Crl.)
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R R Prasad - Full Document

Ajay Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 8 June, 2020

In Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.333 of 2014(12) dt.08-06-2020 4/5 C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No.393 of 2012], the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal, a division bench of this Court vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed another interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Ram Awadhesh Tiwary & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 2 November, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note here that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2012] the appellant was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the trial court. Her prayer made under Section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C. was considered by a division bench of which I was one of the members and vide order dated 14.05.2012, the same was rejected. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Sk. Sotamani vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 10 December, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1431 of 2017(6) dt.10-12-2018 2/3 C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No.393 of 2012], the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal, a division bench of which I was one of the members, vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Sanjay Singh & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 10 December, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2192 of 2017(5) dt.10-12-2018 2/3 C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No.393 of 2012], the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal, a division bench of which I was one of the members, vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Bhola Bhagat vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note here that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2012] the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal before this court, a division bench of which I was one of the members, vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Gajendra Giri vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note here that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2012] the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal before this court, a division bench of which I was one of the members, vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Suresh Kurmi & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note here that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2012] the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal before this court, a division bench of which I was one of the members, vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012 which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Jitan Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 5 October, 2018

In this regard, it would be pertinent to note here that in the matter of Rupam Pathak vs. The State of Bihar through C.B.I., Bihar, Patna [Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2012] the appellant was convicted for charge of culpable homicide amounting to murder by the trial court. In appeal before this court, a division bench of which I was one of the members, vide order dated 14.05.2012, rejected her prayer for bail. Subsequently, she filed an interlocutory application, vide I.A. No.2075 of 2012, which was listed before another division bench, which granted her bail, vide order dated 08.01.2013.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next