Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (1.05 seconds)
Documents citing K. Vijayalakshmi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 3 March, 1998

B. Shivakumar vs Govt. Of A.P., Law Department, ... on 13 April, 1999

26. The judgment in Vijayalakshmi's case (supra) is a case where the appellant's name was not included in the panel of selected name prepared on the ground that she adopted unfair means in the written examination although she stood first in the test held for selection to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer. The said conclusion was arrived at mainly relying on the opinion of Forensic Department that the answers sheets had been replaced. A show-cause notice was issued without supplying to the appellant a copy of the opinion based on which the conclusion reached. The Supreme Court held that deleting the name of the appellant from the panel of selected candidates without supplying a copy of the opinion and without giving an opportunity of being heard to explain her case is in violation of the principles of natural justice.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chairman, All Railway Rec. Board & Anr vs K. Shyam Kumar & Ors on 6 May, 2010

In support of his contentions learned counsel placed reliance on various decisions of this Court viz., K. Vijayalakshmi vs. Union of India (1998) 4 SCC 37; Asha Kaul vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (1993) 2 SCC 573; N.T. Davin Katti vs. Karnanataka Public Service Commission (1990) 3 SCC 157; Union of India vs. Rajesh P.U. (2003) 7 SCC 285; Munna Roy vs. Union 9 of India (2000) 9 SCC 283; Babita Prasad vs. State of Bihar (1993) Suppl.3 SCC 268; Onkar Lal Bajaj vs. Union of India (2003) 2 SCC 673.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 162 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document

Mayank Nagar vs Raj University Of Health Seci Ors on 27 January, 2014

Learned counsel further placed reliance on the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of K. Vijayalakshmi Vs. Union of India & Ors., reported in (1998) 4 SCC 37 and Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors., reported in (2009) 2 SCC 570. It was held that without availability of material, adverse decision should not be taken. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel Shri Ashok Gaur stated that if any of the petitioner indulged in unfair practice of cheating by impersonation in RPMT then this court can very well pass adverse order against them but it should be on a proper scrutiny and not in the manner, it has been done by the respondents by applying the inquiry report of P.K. Singh committee without further scrutiny.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

Nishant Mahar vs Raj University Of Health And Ors on 27 January, 2014

Learned counsel further placed reliance on the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of K. Vijayalakshmi Vs. Union of India & Ors., reported in (1998) 4 SCC 37 and Roop Singh Negi vs Punjab National Bank & Ors., reported in (2009) 2 SCC 570. It was held that without availability of material, adverse decision should not be taken. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel Shri Ashok Gaur stated that if any of the petitioner indulged in unfair practice of cheating by impersonation in RPMT then this court can very well pass adverse order against them but it should be on a proper scrutiny and not in the manner, it has been done by the respondents by applying the inquiry report of P.K. Singh committee without further scrutiny.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document
1   2 3 Next